Re: [Qemu-devel] Should we have a 2.0-rc3 ?

[Peter Maydell]

On 10 April 2014 12:17, Peter Maydell <address@hidden> wrote:
> So far I know of at least three fixes which should probably
> go into 2.0

Status update:
Applied:
 * ACPI fixes (both sets)
 * block queue
 * SDL2 relative mode fixes
 * fix for virtio-net CVE
 * fix for qom-list crash
 * my patch to stack-protector check
Patches on list but need review/ack and/or not sure whether to apply:
 * kvm_physical_sync_dirty_bitmap bug
 * my fix to my stack-protector check patch (oops)
 * vmxnet3 patches
Raised as issues but no patches:
 * PCI bus naming
 * win64 virtio-scsi regression

Assistance welcomed in moving patches in the last two
categories into either "ready to apply" or "not for 2.0" :-)

thanks
-- PMM