Re: [Qemu-devel] Should we have a 2.0-rc3 ?

[Alexander Graf]

> Am 11.04.2014 um 19:37 schrieb Peter Maydell <address@hidden>:
> 
>> On 10 April 2014 12:17, Peter Maydell <address@hidden> wrote:
>> So far I know of at least three fixes which should probably
>> go into 2.0
> 
> Status update:
> Applied:
> * ACPI fixes (both sets)
> * block queue
> * SDL2 relative mode fixes
> * fix for virtio-net CVE
> * fix for qom-list crash
> * my patch to stack-protector check
> Patches on list but need review/ack and/or not sure whether to apply:
> * kvm_physical_sync_dirty_bitmap bug
> * my fix to my stack-protector check patch (oops)
> * vmxnet3 patches
> Raised as issues but no patches:
> * PCI bus naming

Not happening :). With 2.0 we're at least consistent across machine types on 
ppc.

Alex

> * win64 virtio-scsi regression
> 
> Assistance welcomed in moving patches in the last two
> categories into either "ready to apply" or "not for 2.0" :-)
> 
> thanks
> -- PMM