qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] target-arm: Implement XScale cache lockdown ope


From: Peter Maydell
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] target-arm: Implement XScale cache lockdown operations as NOPs
Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2014 18:27:25 +0100

On 19 March 2014 21:13, Peter Maydell <address@hidden> wrote:
> XScale defines some implementation-specific coprocessor registers
> for doing cache lockdown operations. Since QEMU doesn't model a
> cache no proper implementation is possible, but NOP out the
> registers so that guest code like u-boot that tries to use them
> doesn't crash.
>
> Reported-by: <address@hidden>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <address@hidden>
> ---
>  target-arm/helper.c | 15 +++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 15 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/target-arm/helper.c b/target-arm/helper.c
> index 55077ed..7d99236 100644
> --- a/target-arm/helper.c
> +++ b/target-arm/helper.c
> @@ -1525,6 +1525,21 @@ static const ARMCPRegInfo xscale_cp_reginfo[] = {
>        .cp = 15, .crn = 1, .crm = 0, .opc1 = 0, .opc2 = 1, .access = PL1_RW,
>        .fieldoffset = offsetof(CPUARMState, cp15.c1_xscaleauxcr),
>        .resetvalue = 0, },
> +    /* XScale specific cache-lockdown: since we have no cache we NOP these
> +     * and hope the guest does not really rely on cache behaviour.
> +     */
> +    { .name = "XSCALE_LOCK_ICACHE_LINE",
> +      .cp = 15, .opc1 = 0, .crn = 9, .crm = 1, .opc2 = 0,
> +      .access = PL1_W, .type = ARM_CP_NOP },
> +    { .name = "XSCALE_UNLOCK_ICACHE",
> +      .cp = 15, .opc1 = 0, .crn = 9, .crm = 1, .opc2 = 1,
> +      .access = PL1_W, .type = ARM_CP_NOP },
> +    { .name = "XSCALE_DCACHE_LOCK",
> +      .cp = 15, .opc1 = 0, .crn = 9, .crm = 2, .opc2 = 0,
> +      .access = PL1_RW, .type = ARM_CP_NOP },
> +    { .name = "XSCALE_UNLOCK_DCACHE",
> +      .cp = 15, .opc1 = 0, .crn = 9, .crm = 2, .opc2 = 1,
> +      .access = PL1_W, .type = ARM_CP_NOP },
>      REGINFO_SENTINEL
>  };

Ping? In the absence of any review or test comments I'll
put this in target-arm.next...

thanks
-- PMM



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]