qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v1 13/22] target-arm: Register EL2 versions of E


From: Peter Crosthwaite
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v1 13/22] target-arm: Register EL2 versions of ELR and SPSR
Date: Wed, 7 May 2014 16:02:01 +1000

On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 4:08 PM, Edgar E. Iglesias
<address@hidden> wrote:
> From: "Edgar E. Iglesias" <address@hidden>
>
> Signed-off-by: Edgar E. Iglesias <address@hidden>
> ---
>  target-arm/helper.c | 17 +++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 17 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/target-arm/helper.c b/target-arm/helper.c
> index ba1830d..8efc340 100644
> --- a/target-arm/helper.c
> +++ b/target-arm/helper.c
> @@ -2078,6 +2078,19 @@ static const ARMCPRegInfo v8_cp_reginfo[] = {
>      REGINFO_SENTINEL
>  };
>
> +static const ARMCPRegInfo v8_el2_cp_reginfo[] = {
> +    { .name = "ELR_EL2", .state = ARM_CP_STATE_AA64,
> +      .type = ARM_CP_NO_MIGRATE,
> +      .opc0 = 3, .opc1 = 4, .crn = 4, .crm = 0, .opc2 = 1,
> +      .access = PL2_RW,
> +      .fieldoffset = offsetof(CPUARMState, elr_el[ELR_EL_IDX(2)]) },
> +    { .name = "SPSR_EL2", .state = ARM_CP_STATE_AA64,
> +      .type = ARM_CP_NO_MIGRATE,
> +      .opc0 = 3, .opc1 = 4, .crn = 4, .crm = 0, .opc2 = 0,
> +      .access = PL2_RW, .fieldoffset = offsetof(CPUARMState, banked_spsr[6]) 
> },
> +    REGINFO_SENTINEL
> +};
> +
>  static void sctlr_write(CPUARMState *env, const ARMCPRegInfo *ri,
>                          uint64_t value)
>  {
> @@ -2321,6 +2334,10 @@ void register_cp_regs_for_features(ARMCPU *cpu)
>          define_arm_cp_regs(cpu, v8_idregs);
>          define_arm_cp_regs(cpu, v8_cp_reginfo);
>          define_aarch64_debug_regs(cpu);
> +
> +        if (arm_feature(env, ARM_FEATURE_EL2)) {
> +            define_arm_cp_regs(cpu, v8_el2_cp_reginfo);
> +        }

I think this should be outside the if ARM_FEATURE_V8 for consistency.
None of the other per-feature CP register defs are nested within the
ifferry for their ARM version. Detecting the invalid combination of
ARM_FEATURE_EL2 and pre V8 should probably be an assertion done in
arm_cpu_realizefn().

Otherwise:

Reviewed-by: Peter Crosthwaite <address@hidden>

>      }
>      if (arm_feature(env, ARM_FEATURE_MPU)) {
>          /* These are the MPU registers prior to PMSAv6. Any new
> --
> 1.8.3.2
>
>



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]