On 04/30/2014 10:26 PM, Wenchao Xia wrote:
Signed-off-by: Wenchao Xia <address@hidden>
---
vl.c | 3 ++-
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
This, and many of the subsequent patches in the series, are a bit
misleading; I have to go back to 5/28 to make sure that both pieces of
the conversion are in sync. Is there a technical reason why you can't
provide both the qapi definition and the conversion to the new
qapi_event_send_FOO function in the same patch, one patch per FOO,
rather than your current split?