qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] memory: Don't update all memory region when ioe


From: Paolo Bonzini
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] memory: Don't update all memory region when ioeventfd changed
Date: Thu, 08 May 2014 14:48:50 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.4.0

Il 08/05/2014 05:47, address@hidden ha scritto:
From: Gonglei <address@hidden>

memory mappings don't rely on ioeventfds, there is no need
to destroy and rebuild them when manipulating ioeventfds,
otherwise it scarifies performance.

according to testing result, each ioeventfd deleing needs
about 5ms, within which memory mapping rebuilding needs
about 4ms. With many Nics and vmchannel in a VM doing migrating,
there can be many ioeventfds deleting which increasing
downtime remarkably.

Signed-off-by: Gonglei <address@hidden>
Signed-off-by: Herongguang <address@hidden>
---
 memory.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++----------
 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/memory.c b/memory.c
index 3f1df23..2c783f6 100644
--- a/memory.c
+++ b/memory.c
@@ -28,6 +28,7 @@

 static unsigned memory_region_transaction_depth;
 static bool memory_region_update_pending;
+static bool ioeventfd_update_pending;
 static bool global_dirty_log = false;

 /* flat_view_mutex is taken around reading as->current_map; the critical
@@ -786,22 +787,34 @@ void memory_region_transaction_begin(void)
     ++memory_region_transaction_depth;
 }

+static void memory_region_clear_pending(void)
+{
+    memory_region_update_pending = false;
+    ioeventfd_update_pending = false;
+}
+
 void memory_region_transaction_commit(void)
 {
     AddressSpace *as;

     assert(memory_region_transaction_depth);
     --memory_region_transaction_depth;
-    if (!memory_region_transaction_depth && memory_region_update_pending) {
-        memory_region_update_pending = false;
-        MEMORY_LISTENER_CALL_GLOBAL(begin, Forward);
+    if (!memory_region_transaction_depth) {
+        if (memory_region_update_pending) {
+            MEMORY_LISTENER_CALL_GLOBAL(begin, Forward);

-        QTAILQ_FOREACH(as, &address_spaces, address_spaces_link) {
-            address_space_update_topology(as);
-        }
+            QTAILQ_FOREACH(as, &address_spaces, address_spaces_link) {
+                address_space_update_topology(as);
+            }

-        MEMORY_LISTENER_CALL_GLOBAL(commit, Forward);
-    }
+            MEMORY_LISTENER_CALL_GLOBAL(commit, Forward);
+        } else if (ioeventfd_update_pending) {
+            QTAILQ_FOREACH(as, &address_spaces, address_spaces_link) {
+                address_space_update_ioeventfds(as);
+            }
+        }
+        memory_region_clear_pending();
+   }
 }

 static void memory_region_destructor_none(MemoryRegion *mr)
@@ -1373,7 +1386,7 @@ void memory_region_add_eventfd(MemoryRegion *mr,
     memmove(&mr->ioeventfds[i+1], &mr->ioeventfds[i],
             sizeof(*mr->ioeventfds) * (mr->ioeventfd_nb-1 - i));
     mr->ioeventfds[i] = mrfd;
-    memory_region_update_pending |= mr->enabled;
+    ioeventfd_update_pending |= mr->enabled;
     memory_region_transaction_commit();
 }

@@ -1406,7 +1419,7 @@ void memory_region_del_eventfd(MemoryRegion *mr,
     --mr->ioeventfd_nb;
     mr->ioeventfds = g_realloc(mr->ioeventfds,
                                   sizeof(*mr->ioeventfds)*mr->ioeventfd_nb + 
1);
-    memory_region_update_pending |= mr->enabled;
+    ioeventfd_update_pending |= mr->enabled;
     memory_region_transaction_commit();
 }



Applied for 2.1, thanks -- but IIUC Chris's patch (if it worked) would improve performance even more. Is this correct?

Paolo



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]