qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 10/23] target-arm: implement CPACR register l


From: Sergey Fedorov
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 10/23] target-arm: implement CPACR register logic
Date: Wed, 14 May 2014 10:06:32 +0400
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.5.0

On 13.05.2014 20:15, Fabian Aggeler wrote:
> From: Sergey Fedorov <address@hidden>
>
> CPACR register allows to control access rights to coprocessor 0-13
> interfaces. Bits corresponding to unimplemented coprocessors should be
> RAZ/WI. QEMU implements only VFP coprocessor on ARMv6+ targets. So only
> cp10 & cp11 bits are writable.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sergey Fedorov <address@hidden>
> Signed-off-by: Fabian Aggeler <address@hidden>
> ---
>  target-arm/helper.c    |  6 ++++++
>  target-arm/translate.c | 26 +++++++++++++++++++++++---
>  2 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/target-arm/helper.c b/target-arm/helper.c
> index cf1f88c..4e82259 100644
> --- a/target-arm/helper.c
> +++ b/target-arm/helper.c
> @@ -477,6 +477,12 @@ static const ARMCPRegInfo not_v7_cp_reginfo[] = {
>  static void cpacr_write(CPUARMState *env, const ARMCPRegInfo *ri,
>                          uint64_t value)
>  {
> +    uint32_t mask = 0;
> +
> +    if (arm_feature(env, ARM_FEATURE_VFP)) {
> +        mask |= 0x00f00000; /* VFP coprocessor: cp10 & cp11 */
> +    }
> +    value &= mask;
>      if (env->cp15.c1_coproc != value) {
>          env->cp15.c1_coproc = value;
>          /* ??? Is this safe when called from within a TB?  */
> diff --git a/target-arm/translate.c b/target-arm/translate.c
> index 87d0918..c815fb3 100644
> --- a/target-arm/translate.c
> +++ b/target-arm/translate.c
> @@ -6866,9 +6866,29 @@ static int disas_coproc_insn(CPUARMState * env, 
> DisasContext *s, uint32_t insn)
>      const ARMCPRegInfo *ri;
>  
>      cpnum = (insn >> 8) & 0xf;
> -    if (arm_feature(env, ARM_FEATURE_XSCALE)
> -         && ((env->cp15.c15_cpar ^ 0x3fff) & (1 << cpnum)))
> -     return 1;
> +    if (cpnum < 14) {
> +        if (arm_feature(env, ARM_FEATURE_XSCALE)) {
> +            if (~env->cp15.c15_cpar & (1 << cpnum)) {
> +                return 1;
> +            }
> +        } else {
> +            /* Bits [20:21] of CPACR control access to cp10
> +             * Bits [23:22] of CPACR control access to cp11 */
> +            switch ((env->cp15.c1_coproc >> (cpnum * 2)) & 3) {
> +            case 0: /* access denied */
> +                return 1;
> +            case 1: /* privileged mode access only */
> +                if (IS_USER(s)) {
> +                    return 1;
> +                }
> +                break;
> +            case 2: /* reserved */
> +                return 1;
> +            case 3: /* privileged and user mode access */
> +                break;
> +            }
> +        }
> +    }
>  
>      /* First check for coprocessor space used for actual instructions */
>      switch (cpnum) {

Please, look at disas_vfp_insn() and disas_neon_*_insn() functions.
Looks like them should be updated. In that case do not forget to adjust
arm_cpu_reset() so user emulation would be able to execute VFP/NEON
instructions.

Thanks,
Sergey.



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]