qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC 1/8] virtio: add subsections to the migratio


From: Greg Kurz
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC 1/8] virtio: add subsections to the migration stream
Date: Thu, 15 May 2014 12:16:13 +0200

On Thu, 15 May 2014 12:08:26 +0200
Greg Kurz <address@hidden> wrote:
> On Thu, 15 May 2014 11:20:18 +0200
> Andreas Färber <address@hidden> wrote:
> > Am 15.05.2014 09:04, schrieb Greg Kurz:
> > > On Thu, 15 May 2014 12:16:35 +0530
> > > Amit Shah <address@hidden> wrote:
> > >> On (Thu) 15 May 2014 [09:23:51], Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > >>> On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 11:34:25AM +0530, Amit Shah wrote:
> > >>>> On (Wed) 14 May 2014 [17:41:38], Greg Kurz wrote:
> > >>>>> Since each virtio device is streamed in its own section, the idea is 
> > >>>>> to
> > >>>>> stream subsections between the end of the device section and the start
> > >>>>> of the next sections. This allows an older QEMU to complain and exit
> > >>>>> when fed with subsections:
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Unknown savevm section type 5
> > >>>>> Error -22 while loading VM state
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Please make this configurable -- either via configure or device
> > >>>> properties.  That avoids having to break existing configurations that
> > >>>> work without this patch.
> > 
> > Since backwards migration is not supported upstream, wouldn't it be
> > easiest to just add support for the subsection marker and skipping to
> > the end of section in that downstream?
> > 
> 
> Not sure I understand well... Do you suggest to stream the markers first,
> then the device, then the subsections ? And then there would be a way
> we can have the subsections restored before the device ?
> 

Heh just got the clarification thanks to Michael's mail... Sorry for the
confusion and noise. :P


> > >>>>> All users of virtio_load()/virtio_save() need to be patched because 
> > >>>>> the
> > >>>>> subsections are streamed AFTER the device itself.
> > 
> > IMO this is calling for inversion of control - i.e. let virtio devices
> > call generic load/save functions that then dispatch to device-specific
> > code and let us add common stuff in a central place without forgetting
> > to add calls in some new device.
> > 
> 
> That makes a lot of sense.
> 
> > >>>> Since all have the same fixup, I'm wondering if a new section can be
> > >>>> added to the virtio-bus itself, which gets propagated to all devices
> > >>>> upon load in the dest.
> > >>>
> > >>> This calls for a way for devices to inherit properties from the bus,
> > >>> which doesn't exist ATM.
> > >>> Fine but let's not hold up this patchset because of this.
> > >>
> > >> No, only suggestion is to add a migration section in the bus, and then
> > >> it's easier to do this in the post-migrate functions for each device
> > >> -- so only one new section gets introduced instead of all devices
> > >> being modified to send a new subsection.
> > >>
> > > 
> > > The main problem I see is that virtio sucks: as you see in patch 8, we 
> > > have
> > > to be careful not to call vring or virtqueue stuff before the device knows
> > > its endianness or it breaks... I need to study how the virtio-bus gets
> > > migrated to ensure the endian section is streamed before the devices.
> > 
> > There is no ordering guarantee. The state needs to be migrated in the
> > device or bus where it sits, if post-load processing is required; i.e.,
> > if it's in VirtIODevice then something like this series, if it were on
> > VirtioBus exclusively (device asking bus for its endianness each time
> > and does not do post-load stuff) then endianness could be migrated as a
> > new bus section. Not sure if that would help the "broken" state though?
> > 
> 
> IIRW the "broken" state was proposed as a per-device property...
> 
> Fam,
> 
> Do you have plans about the "broken" property ? Is it still needed ?
> 
> > Would touch on Stefan's alias properties for anything but virtio-mmio.
> > 
> 
> OMG... maybe I should hold on then.
> 
> > Regards,
> > Andreas
> > 
> 
> Thanks !
> 



-- 
Gregory Kurz                                     address@hidden
                                                 address@hidden
Software Engineer @ IBM/Meiosys                  http://www.ibm.com
Tel +33 (0)562 165 496

"Anarchy is about taking complete responsibility for yourself."
        Alan Moore.




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]