qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] e1000: allow command-line selection of card mod


From: Michael S. Tsirkin
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] e1000: allow command-line selection of card model
Date: Wed, 21 May 2014 12:04:57 +0300

On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 10:40:54AM +0200, Andreas Färber wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Am 20.05.2014 17:05, schrieb Gabriel L. Somlo:
> > Allow selection of different card models from the qemu
> > command line, to better accomodate a wider range of guests.
> > 
> > Based-on-patch-by: Romain Dolbeau <address@hidden>
> 
> If that patch carried a Signed-off-by line, you should retain it.

Actually I think that would be confusing. Romain didn't sign off
on *this* patch, he signed off on a previous one.
A signature by Gabriel indicates Developer's Certificate of Origin 1.1
which has an option to incorporate other's work - it
does not seem to require signatures by these others.


> Your
> From: line already indicates that it has been rewritten since.
> 
> > Signed-off-by: Gabriel Somlo <address@hidden>
> > ---
> > 
> > Based on the conversation in [2,3,4], and given that I would still like
> > OS X to work as close to "out of the box" as possible, I took a stab
> > at isolating just the bits that allow command-line selection of the
> > specific e1000 device model from Romain's patch set [1]. Hope that's
> > OK with everyone :)
> > 
> > Beyond a few small style improvements, I'm still not 100% familiar with
> > QOM, so I wonder if there isn't a cleaner way to offer "e1000" as some
> > sort of "alias" to the default 82540EM, instead of listing two different
> > devices (e1000 and 82540EM) with otherwise 100% identical properties.
> > However, if the patch is acceptable as-is, I'm happy to leave it be... :)
> > 
> > I tested this on Windows 7 (where the default e1000 continues to work
> > as before), Linux (F20, which is fine with either model), and OS X
> > (10.9 requires E1000_DEV_ID_82545EM_COPPER, which also works with prior
> > versions starting at 10.6; and the default e1000 works on versions <= 10.8).
> > 
> > Comments, suggestions, (or even a straight-forward upstream acceptance
> > of the patch) much appreciated ! :)
> > 
> > Thanks,
> >    Gabriel
> > 
> > [1] http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2014-03/msg01397.html
> > [2] http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2014-03/msg01831.html
> > [3] http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2014-03/msg01841.html
> > [4] http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2014-03/msg03669.html
> > 
> >  hw/net/e1000.c | 97 
> > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
> >  1 file changed, 80 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/hw/net/e1000.c b/hw/net/e1000.c
> > index 8387443..92323a3 100644
> > --- a/hw/net/e1000.c
> > +++ b/hw/net/e1000.c
> > @@ -69,23 +69,29 @@ static int debugflags = DBGBIT(TXERR) | DBGBIT(GENERAL);
> >  
> >  /*
> >   * HW models:
> > - *  E1000_DEV_ID_82540EM works with Windows and Linux
> > + *  E1000_DEV_ID_82540EM works with Windows, Linux, and OS X <= 10.8
> >   *  E1000_DEV_ID_82573L OK with windoze and Linux 2.6.22,
> >   * appears to perform better than 82540EM, but breaks with Linux 2.6.18
> >   *  E1000_DEV_ID_82544GC_COPPER appears to work; not well tested
> > + *  E1000_DEV_ID_82545EM_COPPER works with Linux and OS X >= 10.6
> >   *  Others never tested
> >   */
> > -enum { E1000_DEVID = E1000_DEV_ID_82540EM };
> >  
> >  /*
> >   * May need to specify additional MAC-to-PHY entries --
> >   * Intel's Windows driver refuses to initialize unless they match
> >   */
> > -enum {
> > -    PHY_ID2_INIT = E1000_DEVID == E1000_DEV_ID_82573L ?            0xcc2 :
> > -                   E1000_DEVID == E1000_DEV_ID_82544GC_COPPER ?    0xc30 :
> > -                   /* default to E1000_DEV_ID_82540EM */   0xc20
> > -};
> > +static uint16_t
> 
>    static inline uint16_t maybe?

inline in c file is an optimization hint for a compiler, so
really useless without a benchmark.
It's useful in headers since some compilers warn about unused
non-inline static functions.

> > +e1000_phy_id2_init(uint16_t dev_id) {
> > +    switch(dev_id) {
> 
>        switch (dev_id) {
> 
> > +        case E1000_DEV_ID_82573L:
> > +            return 0xcc2;
> > +        case E1000_DEV_ID_82544GC_COPPER:
> > +            return 0xc30;
> > +        default:
> > +            return 0xc20; /* default for 82540EM and others */
> > +    }
> > +}
> >  
> >  typedef struct E1000State_st {
> >      /*< private >*/
> > @@ -151,7 +157,7 @@ typedef struct E1000State_st {
> >      uint32_t compat_flags;
> >  } E1000State;
> >  
> > -#define TYPE_E1000 "e1000"
> > +#define TYPE_E1000 "e1000-base"
> >  
> >  #define E1000(obj) \
> >      OBJECT_CHECK(E1000State, (obj), TYPE_E1000)
> > @@ -235,7 +241,7 @@ static const char phy_regcap[0x20] = {
> >  static const uint16_t phy_reg_init[] = {
> >      [PHY_CTRL] = 0x1140,
> >      [PHY_STATUS] = 0x794d, /* link initially up with not completed autoneg 
> > */
> > -    [PHY_ID1] = 0x141,                             [PHY_ID2] = 
> > PHY_ID2_INIT,
> > +    [PHY_ID1] = 0x141, /* [PHY_ID2] configured per DevId, from 
> > e1000_reset() */
> >      [PHY_1000T_CTRL] = 0x0e00,                     
> > [M88E1000_PHY_SPEC_CTRL] = 0x360,
> >      [M88E1000_EXT_PHY_SPEC_CTRL] = 0x0d60, [PHY_AUTONEG_ADV] = 0xde1,
> >      [PHY_LP_ABILITY] = 0x1e0,                      [PHY_1000T_STATUS] = 
> > 0x3c00,
> > @@ -271,8 +277,9 @@ set_interrupt_cause(E1000State *s, int index, uint32_t 
> > val)
> >      PCIDevice *d = PCI_DEVICE(s);
> 
>        PCIDeviceClass *pdc = PCI_DEVICE_GET_CLASS(s); // note: not d
> 
> >      uint32_t pending_ints;
> >      uint32_t mit_delay;
> > +    uint16_t dev_id = PCI_DEVICE_GET_CLASS(d)->device_id;
> 
>        uint16_t dev_id = pdc->device_id;
> 
> By convention, don't use these macros inline in FOO(bar)->baz style
> expressions, use a variable.
> Applies elsewhere as well.
> >  
> > -    if (val && (E1000_DEVID >= E1000_DEV_ID_82547EI_MOBILE)) {
> > +    if (val && (dev_id >= E1000_DEV_ID_82547EI_MOBILE)) {
> >          /* Only for 8257x */

I think above is an old bug:
E1000_DEV_ID_82547EI_MOBILE is not 8257x, is it?
Also ICH8 is not a 8257x either.

so I think a flag in E1000State would be cleaner: bool is_8257x.
in init, do a switch statement on device ID and set of 8257x ones.

avoiding QOM on data path is also a good idea.


> >          val |= E1000_ICR_INT_ASSERTED;
> >      }
> > @@ -377,6 +384,7 @@ static void e1000_reset(void *opaque)
> >      E1000State *d = opaque;
> >      uint8_t *macaddr = d->conf.macaddr.a;
> >      int i;
> > +    uint16_t dev_id = PCI_DEVICE_GET_CLASS(d)->device_id;
> >  
> >      timer_del(d->autoneg_timer);
> >      timer_del(d->mit_timer);
> > @@ -385,6 +393,7 @@ static void e1000_reset(void *opaque)
> >      d->mit_ide = 0;
> >      memset(d->phy_reg, 0, sizeof d->phy_reg);
> >      memmove(d->phy_reg, phy_reg_init, sizeof phy_reg_init);
> > +    d->phy_reg[PHY_ID2] = e1000_phy_id2_init(dev_id);

I would just pass E1000State to e1000_phy_id2_init.

> >      memset(d->mac_reg, 0, sizeof d->mac_reg);
> >      memmove(d->mac_reg, mac_reg_init, sizeof mac_reg_init);
> >      d->rxbuf_min_shift = 1;
> > @@ -1440,9 +1449,13 @@ static const VMStateDescription vmstate_e1000 = {
> >      }
> >  };
> >  
> > +/*
> > + * EEPROM contents documented in Tables 5-2 and 5-3, pp. 98-102.
> > + * Note: A valid DevId will be inserted during pci_e1000_init().
> > + */
> >  static const uint16_t e1000_eeprom_template[64] = {
> >      0x0000, 0x0000, 0x0000, 0x0000,      0xffff, 0x0000,      0x0000, 
> > 0x0000,
> > -    0x3000, 0x1000, 0x6403, E1000_DEVID, 0x8086, E1000_DEVID, 0x8086, 
> > 0x3040,
> > +    0x3000, 0x1000, 0x6403, 0 /*DevId*/, 0x8086, 0 /*DevId*/, 0x8086, 
> > 0x3040,
> >      0x0008, 0x2000, 0x7e14, 0x0048,      0x1000, 0x00d8,      0x0000, 
> > 0x2700,
> >      0x6cc9, 0x3150, 0x0722, 0x040b,      0x0984, 0x0000,      0xc000, 
> > 0x0706,
> >      0x1008, 0x0000, 0x0f04, 0x7fff,      0x4d01, 0xffff,      0xffff, 
> > 0xffff,
> > @@ -1511,6 +1524,7 @@ static int pci_e1000_init(PCIDevice *pci_dev)
> >      uint16_t checksum = 0;
> >      int i;
> >      uint8_t *macaddr;
> > +    uint16_t dev_id = PCI_DEVICE_GET_CLASS(pci_dev)->device_id;
> >  
> >      pci_conf = pci_dev->config;
> >  
> > @@ -1531,6 +1545,7 @@ static int pci_e1000_init(PCIDevice *pci_dev)
> >      macaddr = d->conf.macaddr.a;
> >      for (i = 0; i < 3; i++)
> >          d->eeprom_data[i] = (macaddr[2*i+1]<<8) | macaddr[2*i];
> > +    d->eeprom_data[11] = d->eeprom_data[13] = dev_id;
> >      for (i = 0; i < EEPROM_CHECKSUM_REG; i++)
> >          checksum += d->eeprom_data[i];
> >      checksum = (uint16_t) EEPROM_SUM - checksum;
> > @@ -1564,17 +1579,25 @@ static Property e1000_properties[] = {
> >      DEFINE_PROP_END_OF_LIST(),
> >  };
> >  
> > +typedef struct E1000Info_st {
> > +    const char *name;
> > +    uint16_t   vendor_id;
> > +    uint16_t   device_id;
> > +    uint8_t    revision;
> > +} E1000Info;
> > +
> >  static void e1000_class_init(ObjectClass *klass, void *data)
> >  {
> >      DeviceClass *dc = DEVICE_CLASS(klass);
> >      PCIDeviceClass *k = PCI_DEVICE_CLASS(klass);
> > +    const E1000Info *info = data;
> >  
> >      k->init = pci_e1000_init;
> >      k->exit = pci_e1000_uninit;
> >      k->romfile = "efi-e1000.rom";
> > -    k->vendor_id = PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL;
> > -    k->device_id = E1000_DEVID;
> > -    k->revision = 0x03;
> > +    k->vendor_id = info->vendor_id;
> > +    k->device_id = info->device_id;
> > +    k->revision = info->revision;
> >      k->class_id = PCI_CLASS_NETWORK_ETHERNET;
> >      set_bit(DEVICE_CATEGORY_NETWORK, dc->categories);
> >      dc->desc = "Intel Gigabit Ethernet";
> > @@ -1583,16 +1606,56 @@ static void e1000_class_init(ObjectClass *klass, 
> > void *data)
> >      dc->props = e1000_properties;
> >  }
> >  
> > -static const TypeInfo e1000_info = {
> > +static const TypeInfo e1000_base_info = {
> >      .name          = TYPE_E1000,
> >      .parent        = TYPE_PCI_DEVICE,
> >      .instance_size = sizeof(E1000State),
> > -    .class_init    = e1000_class_init,
> > +    .abstract      = true,
> > +};
> > +
> > +static const E1000Info e1000_devices[] = {
> > +    {
> > +        .name      = "e1000", /* default "alias" for 82540EM */
> > +        .vendor_id = PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL,
> > +        .device_id = E1000_DEV_ID_82540EM,
> > +        .revision  = 0x03,
> > +    },
> > +    {
> > +        .name      = "82540EM",
> > +        .vendor_id = PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL,
> > +        .device_id = E1000_DEV_ID_82540EM,
> > +        .revision  = 0x03,
> > +    },
> > +    {
> > +        .name      = "82544GC",
> > +        .vendor_id = PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL,
> > +        .device_id = E1000_DEV_ID_82544GC_COPPER,
> > +        .revision  = 0x03,
> > +    },
> > +    {
> > +        .name      = "82545EM",
> > +        .vendor_id = PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL,
> > +        .device_id = E1000_DEV_ID_82545EM_COPPER,
> > +        .revision  = 0x03,
> > +    },

How about prefixing "e1000-" to the name?
Will make it a bit more friendly to users.


> >  };
> >  
> >  static void e1000_register_types(void)
> >  {
> > -    type_register_static(&e1000_info);
> > +    int i;
> > +
> > +    type_register_static(&e1000_base_info);
> > +    for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(e1000_devices); i++) {
> > +        const E1000Info *info = &e1000_devices[i];
> > +        TypeInfo type_info = {};
> > +
> > +        type_info.name = info->name;
> > +        type_info.parent = TYPE_E1000;
> > +        type_info.class_data = (void *)info;
> > +        type_info.class_init = e1000_class_init;
> > +
> > +        type_register(&type_info);
> > +    }
> >  }
> >  
> >  type_init(e1000_register_types)
> 
> The QOM modeling looks right, and I can't think of a better way to
> handle "e1000" type name compatibility reliably.
> 
> What's missing is an update to tests/e1000-test.c to test those three
> new devices as part of "make check" as well. May involve moving
> qtest_start()/qtest_end() from main() to what is now the nop() test
> function and calling qtest_add_func() four times.
> 
> Regards,
> Andreas
> 
> -- 
> SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
> GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer; HRB 16746 AG Nürnberg



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]