qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] BUG: commit 50a2c6e breaks KVM/ARM (reset/init vcpu ord


From: Paolo Bonzini
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] BUG: commit 50a2c6e breaks KVM/ARM (reset/init vcpu order)
Date: Mon, 26 May 2014 11:55:06 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.5.0

Il 26/05/2014 11:18, Christoffer Dall ha scritto:
Hi,

I noticed that commit 50a2c6e55fa2ce5a2916a2c206bad2c6b0e06df1 broke
KVM/ARM, because the realize function (arm_cpu_realizefn()) now calls
cpu_reset() before qemu_init_vcpu(), which causes kvm_arm_reset_cpu() to
segfault because it dereferences cpu->cpreg_reset_values, which is not
allocated before kvm_arch_init_vcpu().

Simply changing the order of the reset/init calls (see the tiny patch
below) seems to fix it, but I'm not completely sure this is a clean and
correct fix:


diff --git a/target-arm/cpu.c b/target-arm/cpu.c
index 6c6f2b3..794dcb9 100644
--- a/target-arm/cpu.c
+++ b/target-arm/cpu.c
@@ -370,8 +370,8 @@ static void arm_cpu_realizefn(DeviceState *dev, Error 
**errp)

     init_cpreg_list(cpu);

-    cpu_reset(cs);
     qemu_init_vcpu(cs);
+    cpu_reset(cs);

     acc->parent_realize(dev, errp);
 }



Please adivce :)

I looked at the kvm_arch_init_vcpu implementation and it looks good to me.

Acked-by: Paolo Bonzini <address@hidden>

Paolo



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]