Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 3/4] cpu_exec: Add sleeping algorithm

[Paolo Bonzini]

Il 27/05/2014 17:49, Sebastian Tanase ha scritto:
> > Why doesn't it have to update original_low and original_extra, and
> > why doesn't it have to take into account original_extra (the new
> > cpu->icount_extra is zero, but what about the old one)?
>
> The reason I don't update original_low and original_extra is because
> in this case the function will exit (from what I understood):

You're right.  Of course this becomes moot if you move the updating code 
to a separate function; otherwise, please add a comment.

You didn't answer the rest of the question---is it right to ignore 
original_extra, or was it a bug?

Paolo