|
From: | Paolo Bonzini |
Subject: | Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 3/4] cpu_exec: Add sleeping algorithm |
Date: | Tue, 27 May 2014 17:54:33 +0200 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.5.0 |
Il 27/05/2014 17:49, Sebastian Tanase ha scritto:
Why doesn't it have to update original_low and original_extra, and why doesn't it have to take into account original_extra (the new cpu->icount_extra is zero, but what about the old one)?The reason I don't update original_low and original_extra is because in this case the function will exit (from what I understood):
You're right. Of course this becomes moot if you move the updating code to a separate function; otherwise, please add a comment.
You didn't answer the rest of the question---is it right to ignore original_extra, or was it a bug?
Paolo
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |