Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC 8/8] virtio: add endian-ambivalent support to VirtIODevice

[Michael S. Tsirkin]

On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 11:19:47AM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Il 12/06/2014 11:06, Greg Kurz ha scritto:
> >On Thu, 12 Jun 2014 10:55:42 +0200
> >Paolo Bonzini <address@hidden> wrote:
> >
> >>Il 12/06/2014 09:43, Greg Kurz ha scritto:
> >>>Since we know that 0 < max_nr_ports < 32,  is it acceptable to guess
> >>>the correct endianness with a heuristic ?
> >>>
> >>>if (max_nr_ports > tswap32(s->config.max_nr_ports)) {
> >>>   max_nr_ports = bswap32(max_nr_ports);
> >>>}
> >>>
> >>>if (max_nr_ports > tswap32(s->config.max_nr_ports)) {
> >>>   return -EINVAL;
> >>>}
> >>
> >>Yes, I guess it is acceptable.  So first you should fix the code to
> >>always serialize fields as big-endian, and then apply this little hack
> >>and virtio_tswap on top of the previous change.
> >
> >BTW, can someone explain why we stream the device config ?
> 
> For max_nr_ports it is useless indeed.  Let's keep storing it for backwards
> compatibility, but you can remove its load.
> 
> The cols and rows values should be defined by the host and thus could even
> change on migration, there is no need to store them.  As of now, however,
> they are unused in QEMU and should always be zero, because
> VIRTIO_CONSOLE_F_SIZE is not supported.
> 
> Paolo

Maybe just drop unnecessary stuff for new machine types?
Then we won't need hacks to migrate it.

-- 
MST