qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] rules.mak: remove $(sort) from extract-libs


From: Fam Zheng
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] rules.mak: remove $(sort) from extract-libs
Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2014 22:56:11 +0800
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)

On Mon, 06/16 16:43, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Duplicate removal was added to extract-libs in order to avoid including
> the same library multiple times into the linking command line; this could
> potentially happen when using "foo.mo-libs" (which adds the library to
> all components, causing it to appear N times if the module is composed
> of N objects).  However, sorting and removing duplicates causes problems
> with static linking, and also with space-separated linker options as
> found in some Mac OS X packaging systems.  Furthermore, the "optimization"
> is really a non-problem since we do not expect .mo modules to be composed
> of many files.
> 
> Reported-by: Sean Bruno <address@hidden>
> Tested-by: Sean Bruno <address@hidden>
> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <address@hidden>
> ---
>       Peter, can you please apply this directly as it fixes the
>       build and there are no other pending patches?
> ---
>  rules.mak | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/rules.mak b/rules.mak
> index dde8e00..945484e 100644
> --- a/rules.mak
> +++ b/rules.mak
> @@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ QEMU_DGFLAGS += -MMD -MP -MT $@ -MF $(*D)/$(*F).d
>  # Same as -I$(SRC_PATH) -I., but for the nested source/object directories
>  QEMU_INCLUDES += -I$(<D) -I$(@D)
>  
> -extract-libs = $(strip $(sort $(foreach o,$1,$($o-libs))))
> +extract-libs = $(strip $(foreach o,$1,$($o-libs)))
>  expand-objs = $(strip $(sort $(filter %.o,$1)) \
>                    $(foreach o,$(filter %.mo,$1),$($o-objs)) \
>                    $(filter-out %.o %.mo,$1))

I was wondering about the $(sort), now this matches what I proposed in

http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2014-06/msg02351.html

Reviewed-by: Fam Zheng <address@hidden>



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]