qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] pc: acpi-build: make linker & RSDP tables dynam


From: Michael S. Tsirkin
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] pc: acpi-build: make linker & RSDP tables dynamic
Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2014 12:19:10 +0300

On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 12:04:31PM +0300, Marcel Apfelbaum wrote:
> On Tue, 2014-06-17 at 23:19 +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 10:14:01PM +0200, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> > > linker and RSDP tables are build only once, so if later
> > > during rebuild sizes of ACPI tables change pointers will
> > > be patched incorrectly due to wrong offsets.
> > > 
> > > To fix it rebuild linker and RSDP tables along with
> > > the rest of ACPI tables so that they would have correct
> > > offsets.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Igor Mammedov <address@hidden>
> > 
> > If you are adding a new blob you are breaking cross-version migration.
> > Need to handle that depending on pc version as appropriate.
> Besides the above comment,
> Tested-by: Marcel Apfelbaum <address@hidden>
> Reviewed-by: Marcel Apfelbaum <address@hidden>
> 
> Thanks,
> Marcel

This will need a bit more motivation to go in than is
provided here.

> > 
> > > ---
> > >  hw/i386/acpi-build.c | 21 ++++++++++++++-------
> > >  1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/hw/i386/acpi-build.c b/hw/i386/acpi-build.c
> > > index fab25ad..8301bb4 100644
> > > --- a/hw/i386/acpi-build.c
> > > +++ b/hw/i386/acpi-build.c
> > > @@ -1862,6 +1862,10 @@ struct AcpiBuildState {
> > >      /* Copy of table in RAM (for patching). */
> > >      uint8_t *table_ram;
> > >      uint32_t table_size;
> > > +    uint8_t *linker_ram;
> > > +    uint32_t linker_size;
> > > +    uint8_t *rsdp_ram;
> > > +    uint32_t rsdp_size;
> > >      /* Is table patched? */
> > >      uint8_t patched;
> > >      PcGuestInfo *guest_info;
> > > @@ -1998,6 +2002,10 @@ static void acpi_build_update(void *build_opaque, 
> > > uint32_t offset)
> > >      assert(acpi_data_len(tables.table_data) == build_state->table_size);
> > >      memcpy(build_state->table_ram, tables.table_data->data,
> > >             build_state->table_size);
> > > +    memcpy(build_state->linker_ram, tables.linker->data,
> > > +           build_state->linker_size);
> > > +    memcpy(build_state->rsdp_ram, tables.rsdp->data,
> > > +           build_state->rsdp_size);
> > >  
> > >      acpi_build_tables_cleanup(&tables, true);
> > >  }
> > > @@ -2060,14 +2068,13 @@ void acpi_setup(PcGuestInfo *guest_info)
> > >                                                 ACPI_BUILD_TABLE_FILE);
> > >      build_state->table_size = acpi_data_len(tables.table_data);
> > >  
> > > -    acpi_add_rom_blob(NULL, tables.linker, "etc/table-loader");
> > > +    build_state->linker_ram = acpi_add_rom_blob(build_state, 
> > > tables.linker,
> > > +                                                "etc/table-loader");
> > > +    build_state->linker_size = acpi_data_len(tables.linker);
> > >  
> > > -    /*
> > > -     * RSDP is small so it's easy to keep it immutable, no need to
> > > -     * bother with ROM blobs.
> > > -     */
> > > -    fw_cfg_add_file(guest_info->fw_cfg, ACPI_BUILD_RSDP_FILE,
> > > -                    tables.rsdp->data, acpi_data_len(tables.rsdp));
> > > +    build_state->rsdp_ram = acpi_add_rom_blob(build_state, tables.rsdp,
> > > +                                              ACPI_BUILD_RSDP_FILE);
> > > +    build_state->rsdp_size = acpi_data_len(tables.rsdp);
> > >  
> > >      qemu_register_reset(acpi_build_reset, build_state);
> > >      acpi_build_reset(build_state);
> > > -- 
> > > 1.9.3
> 
> 



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]