qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PULL for-2.1 00/40] QMP queue


From: Paolo Bonzini
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PULL for-2.1 00/40] QMP queue
Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2014 21:17:03 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.5.0

Il 20/06/2014 20:44, Luiz Capitulino ha scritto:
On Fri, 20 Jun 2014 19:24:48 +0100
Peter Maydell <address@hidden> wrote:

On 19 June 2014 20:39, Luiz Capitulino <address@hidden> wrote:
The following changes since commit 6baa963f4dcc211801608ebe1e0482b51653350c:

  Merge remote-tracking branch 'remotes/bonzini/scsi-next' into staging 
(2014-06-19 16:18:04 +0100)

are available in the git repository at:


  git://repo.or.cz/qemu/qmp-unstable.git queue/qmp

for you to fetch changes up to b98ff90e9459e0113da8502c03670a9539f90aa1:

  monitor: protect event emission (2014-06-19 15:34:33 -0400)

CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in vl.c
CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in qemu-char.c
CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in qapi-schema.json
CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in monitor.c
CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in include/monitor/monitor.h
CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in hw/core/qdev.c
CONFLICT (modify/delete): docs/qmp/qmp-events.txt deleted in
remotes/qmp-unstable/queue/qmp and modified in HEAD. Version HEAD of
docs/qmp/qmp-events.txt left in tree.

Fun...

That's more conflicts than I feel happy fixing up by hand;
could you rebase and resend, please?

Peter, I've dropped the series that's causing conflicts, can you try to
pull again?

Paolo, Wenchao, it's the QAPI event series that doesn't apply anymore. Can
you please rebase it and post a new version? Could you also:

 1. Add/keep Reviewed-bys of patches that did not change
 2. Drop Reviewed-bys of patches that changed
 3. Add Eric's review suggestions
 4. Test build all targets

I'm fixing the conflicts. Peter, please don't pull. I prefer to have this fixed in a merge commit than as a huge rebase. The conflicts are many but not messy, and it will avoid bisection problems in the future.

Paolo

Paolo




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]