qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [v5][PATCH 0/5] xen: add Intel IGD passthrough support


From: Chen, Tiejun
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [v5][PATCH 0/5] xen: add Intel IGD passthrough support
Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2014 18:37:31 +0800
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0

On 2014/6/25 18:32, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 06:28:34PM +0800, Chen, Tiejun wrote:
On 2014/6/25 18:21, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 06:06:50PM +0800, Chen, Tiejun wrote:
On 2014/6/25 17:59, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Il 25/06/2014 11:55, Michael S. Tsirkin ha scritto:
You're saying we will reserve a free BAR to address those
information to
expose to guest, but which device does this free BAR belong to? The
video
device? Or PCH/MCH?

If you just want to pass a couple of IDs, then don't, it's a waste.
But I still don't know what problem you are trying to solve,
looking at guest driver did not help.

It's not just a couple of IDs, it's also random fields of the MCH
configuration space.  Grep drivers/gpu/drm/i915 for bridge_dev.


Paolo,

No, we're not pointing the bridge_dev here, which is a host bridge at
00:00.0.

Here it should be a ISA bridge at 00:1f.0. Please see intel_detect_pch() to
know why we need this.

Thanks
Tiejun


So what if you dont?

         if (!pch)
                 DRM_DEBUG_KMS("No PCH found.\n");

Is that all? Seems harmless enough.


I don't read the whole driver completely so I don't know now. I guess the
driver may go other live path even without this setting in a live, or this
is a real bug to this driver on Intel platform.

But anyway, I think we should guarantee the driver work under the same
configuration as the native in the passthrough case.

Thanks
Tiejun

Just get it working as a first step. Then address theoretical
issues in follow-up patches.


I'm not sure if we can simply. So I will post this to the driver developer to ask more.

Thanks
Tiejun



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]