qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC] How to handle feature regressions in new QEMU rel


From: Stefan Weil
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC] How to handle feature regressions in new QEMU releases
Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2014 19:11:41 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0

Am 16.07.2014 18:49, schrieb Paolo Bonzini:
> Il 16/07/2014 18:28, Stefan Weil ha scritto:
>> Debian testing includes a brand new libiscsi, but it
>> does not include libiscsi.pc, so pkg-config won't know that it is
>> available and configure will disable libiscsi.
> 
> That's a packaging bug.

CC'ing Michael as he is the Debian maintainer of this package and
Aurélien who maintains QEMU for Debian.

Michael, should I send a Debian bug report for libiscsi-dev? Would an
update of libiscsi for Debian stable be reasonable if versions older
than 1.9 are too buggy to be used? I must admit that I'm a little bit
surprised because iSCSI support worked for me quite well the last time I
used it with Debian wheezy.

Regards
Stefan

> 
>> I have a patch which
>> fixes this, so QEMU for Debian testing could include libiscsi again.
>>
>> Is a feature regression like this one acceptable? Do we need additional
>> testing (maybe run the build bots with --enable-xxx, so builds fail when
>> xxx no longer works)?
> 
> As mentioned in the e49ab19fcaa617ad6cdfe1ac401327326b6a2552 commit
> message, this was intentional.  I was reluctant to do it, but ultimately
> Peter Lieven convinced me that it isn't just about using fancy new APIs;
> libiscsi was too buggy to be useful until release 1.8.0 (even 1.9.0
> requires a patch to avoid segfaults, and many more if you want to run it
> on ARM).
> 
> Paolo




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]