qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v7 3/4] s390x: Migrate to new NMI interface


From: Alexander Graf
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v7 3/4] s390x: Migrate to new NMI interface
Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2014 14:05:46 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.0


On 20.08.14 13:38, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
> On 08/20/2014 09:20 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 20.08.14 12:20, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
>>> On 07/17/2014 04:30 PM, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
>>>> On 07/15/2014 06:29 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>>>>> Il 14/07/2014 05:17, Alexey Kardashevskiy ha scritto:
>>>>>>>> No, you should politely bother them again.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> That does not seem helping though :-/
>>>>>
>>>>> Sorry. :)
>>>>>
>>>>> Well, patch 1 is the same as v6 and for the others Cornelia and Alex can
>>>>> ack it.  It looks good to me though.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Let me clarify things here.
>>>>
>>>> Alex rb'ed to 0/4, Cornelia rb'ed 2/4 and 3/4, so I put Alex's rb to
>>>> 1&2&3&4&5, Cornelia's rb to 2&3, rebase it on top of the current upstream,
>>>> repost after 2.1 is released and resume annoying people again. Is that 
>>>> correct?
>>>>
>>>> This is my current set:
>>>> 5/5 pc_piix: Migrate to new NMI interface
>>>> 4/5 spapr: Add support for new NMI interface
>>>> 3/5 s390x: Migrate to new NMI interface
>>>> 2/5 s390x: Convert QEMUMachine to MachineClass
>>>> 1/5 cpus: Define callback for QEMU "nmi" command
>>>
>>>
>>> Alex, ping.
>>>
>>
>>
>> Uh, what exactly do you expect from me? :)
> 
> No idea :) You could take patches to your tree. I do not understand what to
> do with this set now. Please help. Thanks.

The way I understood your last email you wanted to rebase and repost
them at which point someone could pick them up :)


Alex




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]