Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v7 3/4] s390x: Migrate to new NMI interface

[Alexander Graf]

On 20.08.14 14:11, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
> On 08/20/2014 10:05 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 20.08.14 13:38, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
>>> On 08/20/2014 09:20 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 20.08.14 12:20, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
>>>>> On 07/17/2014 04:30 PM, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
>>>>>> On 07/15/2014 06:29 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>>>>>>> Il 14/07/2014 05:17, Alexey Kardashevskiy ha scritto:
>>>>>>>>>> No, you should politely bother them again.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> That does not seem helping though :-/
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Sorry. :)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Well, patch 1 is the same as v6 and for the others Cornelia and Alex can
>>>>>>> ack it.  It looks good to me though.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Let me clarify things here.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Alex rb'ed to 0/4, Cornelia rb'ed 2/4 and 3/4, so I put Alex's rb to
>>>>>> 1&2&3&4&5, Cornelia's rb to 2&3, rebase it on top of the current 
>>>>>> upstream,
>>>>>> repost after 2.1 is released and resume annoying people again. Is that 
>>>>>> correct?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This is my current set:
>>>>>> 5/5 pc_piix: Migrate to new NMI interface
>>>>>> 4/5 spapr: Add support for new NMI interface
>>>>>> 3/5 s390x: Migrate to new NMI interface
>>>>>> 2/5 s390x: Convert QEMUMachine to MachineClass
>>>>>> 1/5 cpus: Define callback for QEMU "nmi" command
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Alex, ping.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Uh, what exactly do you expect from me? :)
>>>
>>> No idea :) You could take patches to your tree. I do not understand what to
>>> do with this set now. Please help. Thanks.
>>
>> The way I understood your last email you wanted to rebase and repost
>> them at which point someone could pick them up :)
> 
> I wanted answer to "is that correct?" :)
> And I tried replaying the patchset on top of your ppc-next, it applied. But
> I'll repost to make sure that we have the same thing.

Oh, cool. I'll apply them as soon as I finished to recover my HD then :)


Alex