Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 3/4] ioh3420: Remove obsoleted, unused ioh3420_init function

[Knut Omang]

On Mon, 2014-08-25 at 07:47 +0000, Gonglei (Arei) wrote:
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Knut Omang [mailto:address@hidden
> > Sent: Sunday, August 24, 2014 9:32 PM
> > To: address@hidden
> > Cc: Michael S. Tsirkin; Alexey Kardashevskiy; Juan Quintela; Marcel 
> > Apfelbaum;
> > Markus Armbruster; Paolo Bonzini; Gonglei (Arei); Igor Mammedov; Knut
> > Omang
> > Subject: [PATCH v2 3/4] ioh3420: Remove obsoleted, unused ioh3420_init
> > function
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Knut Omang <address@hidden>
> > ---
> >  hw/pci-bridge/ioh3420.c | 24 ------------------------
> >  1 file changed, 24 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/hw/pci-bridge/ioh3420.c b/hw/pci-bridge/ioh3420.c
> > index aed2bf1..e6674a1 100644
> > --- a/hw/pci-bridge/ioh3420.c
> > +++ b/hw/pci-bridge/ioh3420.c
> > @@ -157,30 +157,6 @@ static void ioh3420_exitfn(PCIDevice *d)
> >      pci_bridge_exitfn(d);
> >  }
> > 
> > -PCIESlot *ioh3420_init(PCIBus *bus, int devfn, bool multifunction,
> > -                         const char *bus_name, pci_map_irq_fn
> > map_irq,
> > -                         uint8_t port, uint8_t chassis, uint16_t slot)
> > -{
> > -    PCIDevice *d;
> > -    PCIBridge *br;
> > -    DeviceState *qdev;
> > -
> > -    d = pci_create_multifunction(bus, devfn, multifunction, "ioh3420");
> > -    if (!d) {
> > -        return NULL;
> > -    }
> > -    br = PCI_BRIDGE(d);
> > -
> > -    qdev = DEVICE(d);
> > -    pci_bridge_map_irq(br, bus_name, map_irq);
> > -    qdev_prop_set_uint8(qdev, "port", port);
> > -    qdev_prop_set_uint8(qdev, "chassis", chassis);
> > -    qdev_prop_set_uint16(qdev, "slot", slot);
> > -    qdev_init_nofail(qdev);
> > -
> > -    return PCIE_SLOT(d);
> > -}
> > -
> >  static Property ioh3420_props[] = {
> >      DEFINE_PROP_BIT(COMPAT_PROP_PCP, PCIDevice, cap_present,
> >                      QEMU_PCIE_SLTCAP_PCP_BITNR, true),
> > --
> > 1.9.0
> 
> That's OK. But the declaration of header file should also be removed.
> I noticed MST have pulled into master tree. So, maybe I can post
> another patch to fix this trivial problem.

Yes, definitely, an obvious mistake from me, sorry.
Don't understand how I could have overlooked that..

Knut

> Best regards,
> -Gonglei