[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] [question] virtio-blk performance degradationhappened w
From: |
Christian Borntraeger |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] [question] virtio-blk performance degradationhappened with virito-serial |
Date: |
Mon, 01 Sep 2014 15:09:51 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.0 |
On 01/09/14 14:52, Zhang Haoyu wrote:
>>>> Hi, all
>>>>
>>>> I start a VM with virtio-serial (default ports number: 31), and found that
>>>> virtio-blk performance degradation happened, about 25%, this problem can
>>>> be reproduced 100%.
>>>> without virtio-serial:
>>>> 4k-read-random 1186 IOPS
>>>> with virtio-serial:
>>>> 4k-read-random 871 IOPS
>>>>
>>>> but if use max_ports=2 option to limit the max number of virio-serial
>>>> ports, then the IO performance degradation is not so serious, about 5%.
>>>>
>>>> And, ide performance degradation does not happen with virtio-serial.
>>>
>>> Pretty sure it's related to MSI vectors in use. It's possible that
>>> the virtio-serial device takes up all the avl vectors in the guests,
>>> leaving old-style irqs for the virtio-blk device.
>>>
>> I don't think so,
>> I use iometer to test 64k-read(or write)-sequence case, if I disable the
>> virtio-serial dynamically via device manager->virtio-serial => disable,
>> then the performance get promotion about 25% immediately, then I re-enable
>> the virtio-serial via device manager->virtio-serial => enable,
>> the performance got back again, very obvious.
> add comments:
> Although the virtio-serial is enabled, I don't use it at all, the degradation
> still happened.
This is just wild guessing:
If virtio-blk and virtio-serial share an IRQ, the guest operating system has to
check each virtqueue for activity. Maybe there is some inefficiency doing that.
AFAIK virtio-serial registers 64 virtqueues (on 31 ports + console) even if
everything is unused.
Christian
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [question] virtio-blk performance degradationhappened with virito-serial, Zhang Haoyu, 2014/09/01
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [question] virtio-blk performance degradationhappened with virito-serial, Amit Shah, 2014/09/01
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [question] virtio-blk performance degradationhappened with virito-serial, Zhang Haoyu, 2014/09/01
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [question] virtio-blk performance degradationhappened with virito-serial,
Christian Borntraeger <=
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [question] virtio-blk performance degradationhappened with virito-serial, Paolo Bonzini, 2014/09/01
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [question] virtio-blk performance degradationhappened with virito-serial, Christian Borntraeger, 2014/09/01
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [question] virtio-blk performance degradationhappened with virito-serial, Paolo Bonzini, 2014/09/01
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [question] virtio-blk performance degradationhappened with virito-serial, Christian Borntraeger, 2014/09/01
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [question] virtio-blk performance degradationhappened with virito-serial, Christian Borntraeger, 2014/09/01
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [question] virtio-blk performance degradationhappenedwith virito-serial, Zhang Haoyu, 2014/09/04
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [question] virtio-blk performance degradationhappenedwith virito-serial, Zhang Haoyu, 2014/09/07
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [question] virtio-blk performance degradationhappenedwith virito-serial, Amit Shah, 2014/09/11
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [question] virtio-blk performance degradation happened with virito-serial, Zhang Haoyu, 2014/09/11
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [question] virtio-blk performance degradation happened with virito-serial, Stefan Hajnoczi, 2014/09/12