qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC][patch 3/6] KVM: s390: Add GISA support


From: Heiko Carstens
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC][patch 3/6] KVM: s390: Add GISA support
Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2014 16:19:42 +0200
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)

On Thu, Sep 04, 2014 at 12:52:26PM +0200, address@hidden wrote:
> +void kvm_s390_gisa_register_alert(struct kvm *kvm, u32 gisc)
> +{
> +     int bito = BITS_PER_BYTE * 7 + gisc;
> +
> +     set_bit(bito ^ (BITS_PER_LONG - 1), &kvm->arch.iam);
> +}

Just a very minor nit: you could also use set_bit_inv() & friends.

> +static inline u64 kvm_s390_get_base_disp_rxy(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> +{
> +     u32 x2 = (vcpu->arch.sie_block->ipa & 0x000f);
> +     u32 base2 = vcpu->arch.sie_block->ipb >> 28;
> +     u32 disp2 = ((vcpu->arch.sie_block->ipb & 0x0fff0000) >> 16) +
> +             ((vcpu->arch.sie_block->ipb & 0xff00) << 4);
> +
> +     return (base2 ? vcpu->run->s.regs.gprs[base2] : 0) +
> +             (x2 ? vcpu->run->s.regs.gprs[x2] : 0) + (u64)disp2;
> +}

Not very readable ;) However.. for the RXY instruction format the 20 bit
displacement is usually signed and not unsigned like your code seems to
treat it.




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]