qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/2] target-ppc : Add new processor type 440x5wD


From: Tom Musta
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/2] target-ppc : Add new processor type 440x5wDFPU
Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2014 09:41:45 -0500
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0

On 9/11/2014 2:17 PM, Pierre Mallard wrote:
> This patch add a new processor type 440x5wDFPU for Virtex 5 PPC440
> with an external APU FPU in double precision mode
> ---
>  target-ppc/cpu-models.c     |    3 +++
>  target-ppc/translate_init.c |   38 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 41 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/target-ppc/cpu-models.c b/target-ppc/cpu-models.c
> index 52ac6ec..91e9fac 100644
> --- a/target-ppc/cpu-models.c
> +++ b/target-ppc/cpu-models.c
> @@ -309,6 +309,9 @@
>  #endif
>      POWERPC_DEF("440-Xilinx",    CPU_POWERPC_440_XILINX,             440x5,
>                  "PowerPC 440 Xilinx 5")
> +
> +    POWERPC_DEF("440-Xilinx-w-dfpu",    CPU_POWERPC_440_XILINX,             
> 440x5wDFPU,
> +                "PowerPC 440 Xilinx 5 With a Double Prec. FPU")
>  #if defined(TODO)
>      POWERPC_DEF("440A5",         CPU_POWERPC_440A5,                  440x5,
>                  "PowerPC 440 A5")
> diff --git a/target-ppc/translate_init.c b/target-ppc/translate_init.c
> index ac4d12a..7d7dce7 100644
> --- a/target-ppc/translate_init.c
> +++ b/target-ppc/translate_init.c
> @@ -3923,6 +3923,44 @@ POWERPC_FAMILY(440x5)(ObjectClass *oc, void *data)
>                   POWERPC_FLAG_DE | POWERPC_FLAG_BUS_CLK;
>  }
>  
> +POWERPC_FAMILY(440x5wDFPU)(ObjectClass *oc, void *data)
> +{
> +    DeviceClass *dc = DEVICE_CLASS(oc);
> +    PowerPCCPUClass *pcc = POWERPC_CPU_CLASS(oc);
> +
> +    dc->desc = "PowerPC 440x5 with double precision FPU";
> +    pcc->init_proc = init_proc_440x5;
> +    pcc->check_pow = check_pow_nocheck;
> +    pcc->insns_flags = PPC_INSNS_BASE | PPC_STRING |
> +                       PPC_FLOAT | PPC_FLOAT_FSQRT | 
> +                       PPC_FLOAT_STFIWX |
> +                       PPC_DCR | PPC_WRTEE | PPC_RFMCI |
> +                       PPC_CACHE | PPC_CACHE_ICBI |
> +                       PPC_CACHE_DCBZ | PPC_CACHE_DCBA |
> +                       PPC_MEM_TLBSYNC | PPC_MFTB |
> +                       PPC_BOOKE | PPC_4xx_COMMON | PPC_405_MAC |
> +                       PPC_440_SPEC;
> +    pcc->insns_flags2 = PPC2_FP_CVT_S64;
> +    pcc->msr_mask = (1ull << MSR_POW) |
> +                    (1ull << MSR_CE) |
> +                    (1ull << MSR_EE) |
> +                    (1ull << MSR_PR) |
> +                    (1ull << MSR_FP) |
> +                    (1ull << MSR_ME) |
> +                    (1ull << MSR_FE0) |
> +                    (1ull << MSR_DWE) |
> +                    (1ull << MSR_DE) |
> +                    (1ull << MSR_FE1) |
> +                    (1ull << MSR_IR) |
> +                    (1ull << MSR_DR);
> +    pcc->mmu_model = POWERPC_MMU_BOOKE;
> +    pcc->excp_model = POWERPC_EXCP_BOOKE;
> +    pcc->bus_model = PPC_FLAGS_INPUT_BookE;
> +    pcc->bfd_mach = bfd_mach_ppc_403;
> +    pcc->flags = POWERPC_FLAG_CE | POWERPC_FLAG_DWE |
> +                 POWERPC_FLAG_DE | POWERPC_FLAG_BUS_CLK;
> +}
> +
>  static void init_proc_460 (CPUPPCState *env)
>  {
>      /* Time base */
> 

I don't see any significant issues with this patch, but it does not pass the 
patch checker:

> ./scripts/checkpatch.pl  ../patches/pierre.mallard.fctid.v2/0002.patch
WARNING: line over 80 characters
#19: FILE: target-ppc/cpu-models.c:313:
+    POWERPC_DEF("440-Xilinx-w-dfpu",    CPU_POWERPC_440_XILINX,             
440x5wDFPU,

ERROR: trailing whitespace
#41: FILE: target-ppc/translate_init.c:3935:
+                       PPC_FLOAT | PPC_FLOAT_FSQRT | $

ERROR: Missing Signed-off-by: line(s)

total: 2 errors, 1 warnings, 53 lines checked

../patches/pierre.mallard.fctid.v2/0002.patch has style problems, please 
review.  If any of these errors
are false positives report them to the maintainer, see
CHECKPATCH in MAINTAINERS.






reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]