qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 7/7] virtio-scsi: Handle TMF request cancella


From: Fam Zheng
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 7/7] virtio-scsi: Handle TMF request cancellation asynchronously
Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2014 10:01:49 +0800
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)

On Wed, 09/24 13:18, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Il 24/09/2014 10:27, Fam Zheng ha scritto:
> > For VIRTIO_SCSI_T_TMF_ABORT_TASK and VIRTIO_SCSI_T_TMF_ABORT_TASK_SET,
> > use scsi_req_cancel_async to start the cancellation.
> > 
> > Because each tmf command may cancel multiple requests, we need to use a
> > counter to track the number of remaining requests we still need to wait
> > for.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Fam Zheng <address@hidden>
> > ---
> >  hw/scsi/virtio-scsi.c | 84 
> > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
> >  1 file changed, 77 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/hw/scsi/virtio-scsi.c b/hw/scsi/virtio-scsi.c
> > index fa36e23..9bd7d8a 100644
> > --- a/hw/scsi/virtio-scsi.c
> > +++ b/hw/scsi/virtio-scsi.c
> > @@ -208,12 +208,40 @@ static void *virtio_scsi_load_request(QEMUFile *f, 
> > SCSIRequest *sreq)
> >      return req;
> >  }
> >  
> > -static void virtio_scsi_do_tmf(VirtIOSCSI *s, VirtIOSCSIReq *req)
> > +typedef struct {
> > +    VirtIOSCSIReq  *tmf_req;
> > +    int            remaining;
> > +} VirtIOSCSICancelTracker;
> 
> What about putting "remaining" directly in VirtIOSCSIReq?

It's rarely used, so I preferred managing it here.

> 
> > +typedef struct {
> > +    Notifier                 notifier;
> > +    VirtIOSCSICancelTracker  *tracker;
> > +} VirtIOSCSICancelNotifier;
> > +
> > +static void virtio_scsi_cancel_notify(Notifier *notifier, void *data)
> > +{
> > +    VirtIOSCSICancelNotifier *n = container_of(notifier,
> > +                                               VirtIOSCSICancelNotifier,
> > +                                               notifier);
> > +
> > +    if (--n->tracker->remaining == 0) {
> > +        virtio_scsi_complete_req(n->tracker->tmf_req);
> > +        g_free(n->tracker);
> > +    }
> > +    g_free(n);
> > +}
> > +
> > +/* Return true if the request is ready to be completed and return to guest;
> > + * false if the request will be completed (by some other events) later, for
> > + * example in the case of async cancellation. */
> > +static bool virtio_scsi_do_tmf(VirtIOSCSI *s, VirtIOSCSIReq *req)
> 
> Perhaps return 0/-EINPROGRESS so that it's easier to remember the
> calling convention?

OK!

> 
> >  {
> >      SCSIDevice *d = virtio_scsi_device_find(s, req->req.tmf.lun);
> >      SCSIRequest *r, *next;
> >      BusChild *kid;
> >      int target;
> > +    bool ret = true;
> > +    int cancel_count;
> >  
> >      if (s->dataplane_started && bdrv_get_aio_context(d->conf.bs) != 
> > s->ctx) {
> >          aio_context_acquire(s->ctx);
> > @@ -251,7 +279,18 @@ static void virtio_scsi_do_tmf(VirtIOSCSI *s, 
> > VirtIOSCSIReq *req)
> >                   */
> >                  req->resp.tmf.response = VIRTIO_SCSI_S_FUNCTION_SUCCEEDED;
> >              } else {
> > -                scsi_req_cancel(r);
> > +                VirtIOSCSICancelNotifier *notifier;
> > +                VirtIOSCSICancelTracker *tracker;
> > +
> > +                notifier           = g_new(VirtIOSCSICancelNotifier, 1);
> 
> Slice allocator?

Cancellation is not in the fast path, but I can do it.

> 
> > +                notifier->notifier.notify
> > +                                   = virtio_scsi_cancel_notify;
> > +                tracker            = g_new(VirtIOSCSICancelTracker, 1);
> 
> Same here if you keep VirtIOSCSICancelTracker.
> 
> > +                tracker->tmf_req   = req;
> > +                tracker->remaining = 1;
> > +                notifier->tracker  = tracker;
> > +                scsi_req_cancel_async(r, &notifier->notifier);
> > +                ret = false;
> >              }
> >          }
> >          break;
> > @@ -277,6 +316,7 @@ static void virtio_scsi_do_tmf(VirtIOSCSI *s, 
> > VirtIOSCSIReq *req)
> >          if (d->lun != virtio_scsi_get_lun(req->req.tmf.lun)) {
> >              goto incorrect_lun;
> >          }
> > +        cancel_count = 0;
> >          QTAILQ_FOREACH_SAFE(r, &d->requests, next, next) {
> >              if (r->hba_private) {
> >                  if (req->req.tmf.subtype == 
> > VIRTIO_SCSI_T_TMF_QUERY_TASK_SET) {
> > @@ -286,10 +326,36 @@ static void virtio_scsi_do_tmf(VirtIOSCSI *s, 
> > VirtIOSCSIReq *req)
> >                      req->resp.tmf.response = 
> > VIRTIO_SCSI_S_FUNCTION_SUCCEEDED;
> >                      break;
> >                  } else {
> > -                    scsi_req_cancel(r);
> > +                    /* Before we actually cancel any requests in the next 
> > for
> > +                     * loop, let's count them.  This way, if the bus starts
> > +                     * calling back to the notifier even before we finish 
> > the
> > +                     * loop, the counter, which value is already seen in
> > +                     * virtio_scsi_cancel_notify, will prevent us from
> > +                     * completing the tmf too quickly. */
> > +                    cancel_count++;
> >                  }
> >              }
> >          }
> > +        if (cancel_count) {
> > +            VirtIOSCSICancelNotifier *notifier;
> > +            VirtIOSCSICancelTracker *tracker;
> > +
> > +            tracker            = g_new(VirtIOSCSICancelTracker, 1);
> 
> Same as above.
> 
> > +            tracker->tmf_req   = req;
> > +            tracker->remaining = cancel_count;
> > +
> > +            QTAILQ_FOREACH_SAFE(r, &d->requests, next, next) {
> > +                if (r->hba_private) {
> > +                    notifier           = g_new(VirtIOSCSICancelNotifier, 
> > 1);
> 
> Same as above.
> 
> > +                    notifier->notifier.notify
> > +                                       = virtio_scsi_cancel_notify;
> > +                    notifier->tracker  = tracker;
> > +                    scsi_req_cancel_async(r, &notifier->notifier);
> > +                }
> > +            }
> > +            ret = false;
> > +        }
> > +
> >          break;
> >  
> >      case VIRTIO_SCSI_T_TMF_I_T_NEXUS_RESET:
> > @@ -310,20 +376,22 @@ static void virtio_scsi_do_tmf(VirtIOSCSI *s, 
> > VirtIOSCSIReq *req)
> >          break;
> >      }
> >  
> > -    return;
> > +    return ret;
> >  
> >  incorrect_lun:
> >      req->resp.tmf.response = VIRTIO_SCSI_S_INCORRECT_LUN;
> > -    return;
> > +    return ret;
> >  
> >  fail:
> >      req->resp.tmf.response = VIRTIO_SCSI_S_BAD_TARGET;
> > +    return ret;
> >  }
> >  
> >  void virtio_scsi_handle_ctrl_req(VirtIOSCSI *s, VirtIOSCSIReq *req)
> >  {
> >      VirtIODevice *vdev = (VirtIODevice *)s;
> >      int type;
> > +    bool should_complete = true;
> >  
> >      if (iov_to_buf(req->elem.out_sg, req->elem.out_num, 0,
> >                  &type, sizeof(type)) < sizeof(type)) {
> > @@ -337,7 +405,7 @@ void virtio_scsi_handle_ctrl_req(VirtIOSCSI *s, 
> > VirtIOSCSIReq *req)
> >                      sizeof(VirtIOSCSICtrlTMFResp)) < 0) {
> >              virtio_scsi_bad_req();
> >          } else {
> > -            virtio_scsi_do_tmf(s, req);
> > +            should_complete = virtio_scsi_do_tmf(s, req);
> >          }
> >  
> >      } else if (req->req.tmf.type == VIRTIO_SCSI_T_AN_QUERY ||
> > @@ -350,7 +418,9 @@ void virtio_scsi_handle_ctrl_req(VirtIOSCSI *s, 
> > VirtIOSCSIReq *req)
> >              req->resp.an.response = VIRTIO_SCSI_S_OK;
> >          }
> >      }
> > -    virtio_scsi_complete_req(req);
> > +    if (should_complete) {
> > +        virtio_scsi_complete_req(req);
> > +    }
> >  }
> >  
> >  static void virtio_scsi_handle_ctrl(VirtIODevice *vdev, VirtQueue *vq)
> > 
> 
> Very nice apart from these comments.

Thanks for reviewing!

Fam



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]