qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 0/2] Recursive op blockers


From: Benoît Canet
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 0/2] Recursive op blockers
Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2014 16:08:46 +0000
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)

On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 09:00:50PM +0200, Benoît Canet wrote:
> in v2:
>         Added a base parameters [Kevin]
>         Remove multiple blockers [Kevin]
> 
>         Addressed Kevin's comments except BLOCK_OP_TYPE_MIRROR_REPLACE 
> relaxing
>         and "You need to unblock all of the BDSes that are going to be 
> removed.
>         Aren't you unblocking more than that here?".
> 
> 
> pass ./check -qcow2
> 
> Benoît Canet (2):
>   block: Rename BLOCK_OP_TYPE_REPLACE to BLOCK_OP_TYPE_MIRROR_REPLACE
>   block: Make op blockers recursive
> 
>  block-migration.c         |   4 +-
>  block.c                   | 123 
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
>  block/blkverify.c         |  21 ++++++++
>  block/commit.c            |   2 +
>  block/mirror.c            |  26 +++++++---
>  block/quorum.c            |  29 +++++++++++
>  block/stream.c            |   2 +
>  block/vmdk.c              |  32 ++++++++++++
>  blockjob.c                |   6 +--
>  include/block/block.h     |  14 ++++--
>  include/block/block_int.h |  10 ++++
>  11 files changed, 242 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
> 
> -- 
> 2.1.0
> 

Hello people,

Gentle ping,

I would really like these patches to get rev-by and merged for the next release
since they actually fix QEMU.

Under the new rule of code review I choose Markus or Jeff to do the initial
revision.
I could nag Kevin into reviewing it but it's not the process anymore.

Best regards

Benoît



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]