qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v11 00/34] modify boot order of guest, and take


From: Paolo Bonzini
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v11 00/34] modify boot order of guest, and take effect after rebooting
Date: Thu, 09 Oct 2014 13:17:48 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.1.1

Il 09/10/2014 11:47, Gerd Hoffmann ha scritto:
> On Mi, 2014-10-08 at 19:00 +0800, Gonglei wrote:
>> On 2014/10/7 16:00, Gonglei (Arei) wrote:
>>
>>> From: Gonglei <address@hidden>
>>>
>>> Changes since v10:
>>>  1. add handler for virtio-blk-pci/s390/ccw in PATCH 28.
>>>  2. add especial bootidnex setter/getter functions for usb-storage
>>>     device in PATCH 29.
>>>  3. add bootindex qom property for nvma and ne2k_isa devices,
>>>     avoid regrassion in PATCH 30.
>>>  4. change fprintf to error_report in bootdevice.c in PATCH 34.
>>>  5. rebase on the latest qemu master tree.
>>>  6. add 'Reviewed-by' in other patches. (Thanks, Gerd)
>>>
>>
>>
>> Hi, Gerd
>>
>> Could you please review the v11 and consider to merge this series in your 
>> tree?
>> I have no idea which maintainer can apply this series. It seems that only you
>> and Eduardo  interested in and reviewed this patch series at present. :(
> 
> Yea, for these cross-tree changes it isn't always clear which way they
> should be merged.  qom or pc would make sense I think.
> 
> I can prepare a pull request too, but I'd like to have a second opinion
> on the stuff which is outside of my primary focus:
> 
>   * fw_cfg changes (mst?  paolo?)
>   * qom bits (andreas?  paolo?, eduardo?)

I have not been looking at the series, you and Eduardo could do a better
job.  Anyway, I looked at the above pieces and they look good as far as
using/extending the API is concerned.

Paolo

> I'll go take "no answer" as "no objections", but I'd prefer to apply one
> or another "reviewed-by" to the series.
> 
> thanks,
>   Gerd
> 
> 
> 
> 




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]