Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v11 00/34] modify boot order of guest, and take effect after rebooting

[Gonglei]

> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v11 00/34] modify boot order of guest, and
> take effect after rebooting
> 
> On Thu, 09 Oct 2014 11:47:12 +0200
> Gerd Hoffmann <address@hidden> wrote:
> 
> > On Mi, 2014-10-08 at 19:00 +0800, Gonglei wrote:
> > > On 2014/10/7 16:00, Gonglei (Arei) wrote:
> > >
> > > > From: Gonglei <address@hidden>
> > > >
> > > > Changes since v10:
> > > >  1. add handler for virtio-blk-pci/s390/ccw in PATCH 28.
> > > >  2. add especial bootidnex setter/getter functions for usb-storage
> > > >     device in PATCH 29.
> > > >  3. add bootindex qom property for nvma and ne2k_isa devices,
> > > >     avoid regrassion in PATCH 30.
> > > >  4. change fprintf to error_report in bootdevice.c in PATCH 34.
> > > >  5. rebase on the latest qemu master tree.
> > > >  6. add 'Reviewed-by' in other patches. (Thanks, Gerd)
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Hi, Gerd
> > >
> > > Could you please review the v11 and consider to merge this series in your
> tree?
> > > I have no idea which maintainer can apply this series. It seems that only 
> > > you
> > > and Eduardo  interested in and reviewed this patch series at present. :(
> >
> > Yea, for these cross-tree changes it isn't always clear which way they
> > should be merged.  qom or pc would make sense I think.
> >
> > I can prepare a pull request too, but I'd like to have a second opinion
> > on the stuff which is outside of my primary focus:
> >
> >   * fw_cfg changes (mst?  paolo?)
> >   * qom bits (andreas?  paolo?, eduardo?)
> >
> > I'll go take "no answer" as "no objections", but I'd prefer to apply one
> > or another "reviewed-by" to the series.
> >
> > thanks,
> >   Gerd
> >
> 
> The s390x team is planning to use some functionality of this patch set as base
> for diag308
> implementation. I'll give v11 a try on our platform.
> 
> Michael
> 
Great! 

Please let us know your results. Thanks :)

Best regards,
-Gonglei