qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] snapshot: use local variable to bdrv_pwrite_syn


From: Max Reitz
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] snapshot: use local variable to bdrv_pwrite_syncL1 table
Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2014 12:53:40 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.2.0

On 2014-10-21 at 12:49, Zhang Haoyu wrote:
Use local variable to bdrv_pwrite_sync L1 table,
needless to make conversion of cached L1 table between
big-endian and host style.

Signed-off-by: Zhang Haoyu <address@hidden>
---
   block/qcow2-refcount.c | 22 +++++++---------------
   1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)

diff --git a/block/qcow2-refcount.c b/block/qcow2-refcount.c
index 2bcaaf9..8b318e8 100644
--- a/block/qcow2-refcount.c
+++ b/block/qcow2-refcount.c
@@ -881,7 +881,6 @@ int qcow2_update_snapshot_refcount(BlockDriverState *bs,
   {
       BDRVQcowState *s = bs->opaque;
       uint64_t *l1_table, *l2_table, l2_offset, offset, l1_size2;
-    bool l1_allocated = false;
       int64_t old_offset, old_l2_offset;
       int i, j, l1_modified = 0, nb_csectors, refcount;
       int ret;
@@ -889,6 +888,11 @@ int qcow2_update_snapshot_refcount(BlockDriverState *bs,
       l2_table = NULL;
       l1_table = NULL;
Please remove this assignment; thanks to this hunk we don't need it anymore.
OK.
       l1_size2 = l1_size * sizeof(uint64_t);
+    l1_table = g_try_malloc0(align_offset(l1_size2, 512));
I wanted to propose using qemu_try_blockalign(), but since it'd require
a memset() afterwards, it gets rather ugly.

Could you at least replace 512 by BDRV_SECTOR_SIZE, and maybe even
align_offset() by ROUND_UP()? We should probably do the latter in all of
the qcow2 code, though, I think it's just there because it has been
around since before there was a ROUND_UP()...

Good, I will replace 512 with BDRV_SECTOR_SIZE, and replace align_offset with 
ROUND_UP.
+    if (l1_size2 && l1_table == NULL) {
+        ret = -ENOMEM;
+        goto fail;
+    }
s->cache_discards = true; @@ -896,13 +900,6 @@ int qcow2_update_snapshot_refcount(BlockDriverState *bs,
        * l1_table_offset when it is the current s->l1_table_offset! Be careful
        * when changing this! */
       if (l1_table_offset != s->l1_table_offset) {
-        l1_table = g_try_malloc0(align_offset(l1_size2, 512));
-        if (l1_size2 && l1_table == NULL) {
-            ret = -ENOMEM;
-            goto fail;
-        }
-        l1_allocated = true;
-
           ret = bdrv_pread(bs->file, l1_table_offset, l1_table, l1_size2);
           if (ret < 0) {
               goto fail;
@@ -912,8 +909,7 @@ int qcow2_update_snapshot_refcount(BlockDriverState *bs,
               be64_to_cpus(&l1_table[i]);
       } else {
           assert(l1_size == s->l1_size);
-        l1_table = s->l1_table;
-        l1_allocated = false;
+        memcpy(l1_table, s->l1_table, l1_size2);
       }
for(i = 0; i < l1_size; i++) {
@@ -1055,12 +1051,8 @@ fail:
I don't think it will change a lot, but could you wrap the
"s->cache_discards = false; qcow2_process_discards(bs, ret);" in an "if
(s->cache_discards)"? You have introduced a case where s->cache_discards
was still false, so we don't need to call qcow2_process_discards() then
(which will hopefully return immediately, but well...).
s->cache_discards's initial value is true in qcow2_update_snapshot_refcount(),
where s->cache_discards is set to false?

It is? I only see it set to true after the "if (l1_size2 && l1_table == NULL)" conditional block.

Well, okay, I don't know about the callers of qcow2_process_discards(), so they may have set s->cache_discards to true and then expect this function to always call qcow2_process_discards() and set s->cache_discards to false. Okay, then let's just keep it as it is.

Max

Or you means s->cache_discards should be set to false
after g_try_malloc0(align_offset(l1_size2, 512)) failed.

           }
ret = bdrv_pwrite_sync(bs->file, l1_table_offset, l1_table, l1_size2);
-
-        for (i = 0; i < l1_size; i++) {
-            be64_to_cpus(&l1_table[i]);
-        }
       }
-    if (l1_allocated)
+    if (l1_table)
           g_free(l1_table);
Just drop the condition. g_free(l1_table); is enough.

OK.
       return ret;
   }
The change itself is good, it just needs some polishing.

Max




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]