qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] hw/ppc/spapr_pci.c: Avoid functions not in glib


From: Peter Maydell
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] hw/ppc/spapr_pci.c: Avoid functions not in glib 2.12 (g_hash_table_iter_*)
Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2014 12:33:57 +0000

Ping! It would be nice to be able to get glib2.12 builds fixed...

thanks
-- PMM

On 22 October 2014 18:41, Peter Maydell <address@hidden> wrote:
> The g_hash_table_iter_* functions for iterating through a hash table
> are not present in glib 2.12, which is our current minimum requirement.
> Rewrite the code to use g_hash_table_foreach() instead.
>
> Cc: address@hidden
> Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <address@hidden>
> ---
> I have tested that this builds with a glib 2.12, and also that it
> passes 'make check', but no further testing beyond that. Somebody
> with an spapr migration test should check it doesn't break things...
>
> The observant will note that since this is fixing breakage
> introduced in commit 9a321e92343 (merged in late June) we
> obviously released 2.1 in a "doesn't build all targets on
> glib 2.12" state, and nobody actually complained... So there's
> maybe scope for debate about moving the minimum version up,
> but I think for 2.2 we should stick with the current definition.
>
> The cc:stable is in the interests of fixing that build breakage
> in 2.1.x.
>
>  hw/ppc/spapr_pci.c | 28 +++++++++++++++++-----------
>  1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/hw/ppc/spapr_pci.c b/hw/ppc/spapr_pci.c
> index ad0da7f..21b95b3 100644
> --- a/hw/ppc/spapr_pci.c
> +++ b/hw/ppc/spapr_pci.c
> @@ -704,28 +704,34 @@ static const VMStateDescription vmstate_spapr_pci_msi = 
> {
>      },
>  };
>
> +static void spapr_pci_fill_msi_devs(gpointer key, gpointer value,
> +                                    gpointer opaque)
> +{
> +    sPAPRPHBState *sphb = opaque;
> +
> +    sphb->msi_devs[sphb->msi_devs_num].key = *(uint32_t *)key;
> +    sphb->msi_devs[sphb->msi_devs_num].value = *(spapr_pci_msi *)value;
> +    sphb->msi_devs_num++;
> +}
> +
>  static void spapr_pci_pre_save(void *opaque)
>  {
>      sPAPRPHBState *sphb = opaque;
> -    GHashTableIter iter;
> -    gpointer key, value;
> -    int i;
> +    int msi_devs_num;
>
>      if (sphb->msi_devs) {
>          g_free(sphb->msi_devs);
>          sphb->msi_devs = NULL;
>      }
> -    sphb->msi_devs_num = g_hash_table_size(sphb->msi);
> -    if (!sphb->msi_devs_num) {
> +    sphb->msi_devs_num = 0;
> +    msi_devs_num = g_hash_table_size(sphb->msi);
> +    if (!msi_devs_num) {
>          return;
>      }
> -    sphb->msi_devs = g_malloc(sphb->msi_devs_num * 
> sizeof(spapr_pci_msi_mig));
> +    sphb->msi_devs = g_malloc(msi_devs_num * sizeof(spapr_pci_msi_mig));
>
> -    g_hash_table_iter_init(&iter, sphb->msi);
> -    for (i = 0; g_hash_table_iter_next(&iter, &key, &value); ++i) {
> -        sphb->msi_devs[i].key = *(uint32_t *) key;
> -        sphb->msi_devs[i].value = *(spapr_pci_msi *) value;
> -    }
> +    g_hash_table_foreach(sphb->msi, spapr_pci_fill_msi_devs, sphb);
> +    assert(sphb->msi_devs_num == msi_devs_num);
>  }
>
>  static int spapr_pci_post_load(void *opaque, int version_id)
> --
> 1.9.1



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]