qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC][PATCH v2] block: add write threshold reporting fo


From: Eric Blake
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC][PATCH v2] block: add write threshold reporting for block devices
Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2014 17:10:44 -0700
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.2.0

On 11/20/2014 04:04 AM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
>>
>> We're "only" talking about an optimisation here, even though a very
>> useful one, so I wouldn't easily make compromises here. We should
>> probably insist on using the node-name. Management tools need new code
>> anyway to make use of the new functionality, so they can implement
>> node-name support as well while they're at it.
> 
> Using node-name is the best thing to do.
> 
> My concern is just whether libvirt and other management tools are
> actually using node-name yet.

Libvirt is not yet using it, but the more compelling we make it, the
more libvirt will accelerate the efforts needed to start using
node-name.  I'm okay with requiring node-name here.

-- 
Eric Blake   eblake redhat com    +1-919-301-3266
Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]