qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v13 2/3] sPAPR: Implement EEH RTAS calls


From: Gavin Shan
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v13 2/3] sPAPR: Implement EEH RTAS calls
Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2014 10:08:20 +1100
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)

On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 03:52:17PM +0100, Alexander Graf wrote:
>On 15.12.14 01:15, Gavin Shan wrote:
>> The emulation for EEH RTAS requests from guest isn't covered
>> by QEMU yet and the patch implements them.
>> 
>> The patch defines constants used by EEH RTAS calls and adds
>> callback sPAPRPHBClass::eeh_handler, which is going to be used
>> this way:
>> 
>>   * RTAS calls are received in spapr_pci.c, sanity check is done
>>     there.
>>   * RTAS handlers handle what they can. If there is something it
>>     cannot handle and sPAPRPHBClass::eeh_handler callback is defined,
>>     it is called.
>>   * sPAPRPHBClass::eeh_handler is only implemented for VFIO now. It
>>     does ioctl() to the IOMMU container fd to complete the call. Error
>>     codes from that ioctl() are transferred back to the guest.
>> 
>> [aik: defined RTAS tokens for EEH RTAS calls]
>> Signed-off-by: Gavin Shan <address@hidden>
>> ---
>>  hw/ppc/spapr_pci.c          | 246 
>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>  include/hw/pci-host/spapr.h |   7 ++
>>  include/hw/ppc/spapr.h      |  43 +++++++-
>>  3 files changed, 294 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>> 
>> diff --git a/hw/ppc/spapr_pci.c b/hw/ppc/spapr_pci.c
>> index 3d70efe..3bb1971 100644
>> --- a/hw/ppc/spapr_pci.c
>> +++ b/hw/ppc/spapr_pci.c
>> @@ -406,6 +406,233 @@ static void 
>> rtas_ibm_query_interrupt_source_number(PowerPCCPU *cpu,
>>      rtas_st(rets, 2, 1);/* 0 == level; 1 == edge */
>>  }
>>  
>> +static int rtas_handle_eeh_request(sPAPREnvironment *spapr,
>> +                                   uint64_t buid, uint32_t req, uint32_t 
>> opt)
>> +{
>> +    sPAPRPHBState *sphb = spapr_pci_find_phb(spapr, buid);
>> +    sPAPRPHBClass *info = SPAPR_PCI_HOST_BRIDGE_GET_CLASS(sphb);
>
>What happens when you try to cast NULL? Could a guest process invoke a
>host assert() through this and abort the whole VM?
>

Yes, it would cause core dump. I had one experiment to force assigning
NULL to "sphb" before doing the cast, the whole VM is aborted. So I
guess you're happy to have something as follows. If you're not suggesting
something else, I'll update the code as follows in next version:

        sPAPRPHBState *sphb = spapr_pci_find_phb(spapr, buid);
        sPAPRPHBClass *info;

        if (!sphb) {
            return -ENODEV;
        }

        info = SPAPR_PCI_HOST_BRIDGE_GET_CLASS(sphb);
        if (!info->eeh_handler) {
            return -ENOENT;
        }

        return info->eeh_handler(sphb, req, opt);

>> +
>> +    if (!sphb || !info->eeh_handler) {
>> +        return -ENOENT;
>> +    }
>> +
>> +    return info->eeh_handler(sphb, req, opt);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void rtas_ibm_set_eeh_option(PowerPCCPU *cpu,
>> +                                    sPAPREnvironment *spapr,
>> +                                    uint32_t token, uint32_t nargs,
>> +                                    target_ulong args, uint32_t nret,
>> +                                    target_ulong rets)
>> +{
>> +    uint32_t addr, option;
>> +    uint64_t buid = ((uint64_t)rtas_ld(args, 1) << 32) | rtas_ld(args, 2);
>> +    int ret;
>> +
>> +    if ((nargs != 4) || (nret != 1)) {
>> +        goto param_error_exit;
>> +    }
>> +
>> +    addr = rtas_ld(args, 0);
>> +    option = rtas_ld(args, 3);
>> +    switch (option) {
>> +    case RTAS_EEH_ENABLE:
>> +        if (!spapr_pci_find_dev(spapr, buid, addr)) {
>> +            goto param_error_exit;
>> +        }
>> +        break;
>> +    case RTAS_EEH_DISABLE:
>> +    case RTAS_EEH_THAW_IO:
>> +    case RTAS_EEH_THAW_DMA:
>
>So these don't use the addr hint?
>

No, there're no address as argument of this RTAS call "ibm,set-eeh-option".
The RTAS call has 4 arguments, all of them are 32-bits: BUID high part, BUID
low part, PE address, option. The option could be one of: enable/disable EEH
functionality, enable IO path, enable DMA path.

Thanks,
Gavin

>
>Alex
>




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]