Re: [Qemu-devel] [PULL 0/8] pc: resizeable ROM blocks

[Michael S. Tsirkin]

On Wed, Dec 24, 2014 at 01:25:16PM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 24/12/2014 12:51, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > The following changes since commit d86fb03469e016af4e54f04efccbc20a8afa3e19:
> > 
> >   Merge remote-tracking branch 'remotes/spice/tags/pull-spice-20141216-1' 
> > into staging (2014-12-16 16:52:42 +0000)
> > 
> > are available in the git repository at:
> > 
> >   git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/virt/kvm/mst/qemu.git tags/for_upstream
> > 
> > for you to fetch changes up to de101bf0e5b1f2bb7759074021f1e082752428ef:
> > 
> >   acpi-build: make ROMs RAM blocks resizeable (2014-12-16 22:14:11 +0200)
> > 
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------
> > pc: resizeable ROM blocks
> > 
> > This makes ROM blocks resizeable.  This infrastructure is required for other
> > functionality we have queued.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <address@hidden>
> > 
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------
> > Michael S. Tsirkin (8):
> >       cpu: add cpu_physical_memory_clear_dirty_range_nocode
> >       memory: add memory_region_set_size
> >       exec: cpu_physical_memory_set/clear_dirty_range
> >       exec: split length -> used_length/max_length
> >       exec: qemu_ram_alloc_resizeable, qemu_ram_resize
> >       arch_init: support resizing on incoming migration
> >       memory: API to allocate resizeable RAM MR
> >       acpi-build: make ROMs RAM blocks resizeable
> > 
> >  hw/lm32/lm32_hwsetup.h  |   3 +-
> >  include/exec/cpu-all.h  |  12 +++--
> >  include/exec/memory.h   |  34 +++++++++++++
> >  include/exec/ram_addr.h |  22 +++++++--
> >  include/hw/loader.h     |   4 +-
> >  arch_init.c             |  28 ++++++-----
> >  exec.c                  | 129 
> > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
> >  hw/core/loader.c        |  18 +++++--
> >  hw/i386/acpi-build.c    |  19 +++++--
> >  memory.c                |  33 +++++++++++++
> >  10 files changed, 242 insertions(+), 60 deletions(-)
> > 
> > 
> > 
> 
> I don't think these are necessary, and I thought these were just RFC
> when they were posted.  I and mst didn't really understand each other,
> and I take the fault for not reviewing the submission; however, Peter,
> please hold these for a little more.
> 
> Paolo

Yes, please do, I'd like Paolo to review at least the memory core
changes.

-- 
MST