qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PULL 00/26] Block patches


From: Paolo Bonzini
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PULL 00/26] Block patches
Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2015 11:32:14 +0100
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0


On 12/01/2015 10:52, Fam Zheng wrote:
> On Sat, 01/10 19:10, Peter Maydell wrote:
>> On 10 January 2015 at 19:05, Peter Maydell <address@hidden> wrote:
>>> On 9 January 2015 at 10:16, Stefan Hajnoczi <address@hidden> wrote:
>>>> This pull request depends on the previous block pull request which has not 
>>>> been
>>>> merged yet.  It was sent on Monday, 5th of January (Message-id:
>>>> <address@hidden>).
>>>>
>>>> The following changes since commit 
>>>> 3bd54e576f40f1d5bf45b4828c7316efd76a4db6:
>>>>
>>>>   migration/block: fix pending() return value (2015-01-05 11:34:52 +0000)
>>>>
>>>> are available in the git repository at:
>>>>
>>>>   git://github.com/stefanha/qemu.git tags/block-pull-request
>>>>
>>>> for you to fetch changes up to 4cba4284918145de66e27959725559f8aaf764ef:
>>>>
>>>>   NVMe: Set correct VS Value for 1.1 Compliant Controllers (2015-01-09 
>>>> 10:12:23 +0000)
>>>
>>> I'm confused. You say this pull depends on the other one, but
>>> the emails give the same tag name for both, so I can't pull
>>> the other one first. (In fact, if not for this one failing I
>>> would have applied it under the assumption that it *was* the
>>> previous pullreq...)
>>>
>>> In any case, this one fails 'make check':
>>
>> Failed also and differently on my 32 bit ARM board, though that
>> may just be because I run this set with V=1; last part
>> of the log below. Looks like something is trying to run
>> qemu-system-arm without specifying a machine to use...
>>
> 
> Ouch! This is something that proves really hard to do.
> 
> Stefan, please drop the make check-block series in next revision.

No need to drop the bug fixes.  One can just drop patch 11
("tests/Makefile: Add check-block to make check on Linux").

Paolo



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]