|
From: | Chen, Tiejun |
Subject: | Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC][PATCH 1/1] libxl: add one machine property to support IGD GFX passthrough |
Date: | Thu, 22 Jan 2015 08:51:25 +0800 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0 |
On 2015/1/21 21:48, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
On Mi, 2015-01-21 at 11:37 +0000, Ian Jackson wrote:Tiejun Chen writes ("[RFC][PATCH 1/1] libxl: add one machine property to support IGD GFX passthrough"):When we're working to support IGD GFX passthrough with qemu upstream, instead of "-gfx_passthru" we'd like to make that a machine option, "-machine xxx,gfx_passthru=on". This need to bring several changes on tool side.Has the corresponding patch to qemu-upstream been accepted yet ? I'd like to see a confirmation from the qemu side that this is going into their tree and that the command-line option syntax has been agreed.Suggested at patch review, not merged (guess thats why it is tagged 'rfc', to get both qemu+xen on the same page).
Yeah, this is exactly what I intended to do here :)
While being at it: Should we name this 'igd-passthru' instead of 'gfx-passthru'? The hostbridge / isabridge quirks needed are actually specific to igd and are not needed for -- say -- nvidia gfx cards.
At this point I just concern here if we still use 'gfx_passthrou', at least it may look like a backward compatibility with older versions of qemu in Xen side, qemu-xen-traditional. But I'd like to follow your final option.
Thanks Tiejun
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |