qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 07/11] target-arm: Split AArch64 cases out of at


From: Greg Bellows
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 07/11] target-arm: Split AArch64 cases out of ats_write()
Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2015 14:30:39 -0600



On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 12:20 PM, Peter Maydell <address@hidden> wrote:
Instead of simply reusing ats_write() as the handler for both AArch32
and AArch64 address translation operations, use a different function
for each with the common code in a third function. This is necessary
because the semantics for selecting the right translation regime are
different; we are only getting away with sharing currently because
we don't support EL2 and only support EL3 in AArch32.

Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <address@hidden>
---
 target-arm/helper.c | 33 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/target-arm/helper.c b/target-arm/helper.c
index 06478d8..04bc0a1 100644
--- a/target-arm/helper.c
+++ b/target-arm/helper.c
@@ -1435,13 +1435,13 @@ static CPAccessResult ats_access(CPUARMState *env, const ARMCPRegInfo *ri)
     return CP_ACCESS_OK;
 }

-static void ats_write(CPUARMState *env, const ARMCPRegInfo *ri, uint64_t value)
+static uint64_t do_ats_write(CPUARMState *env, uint64_t value,
+                             int access_type, int is_user)
 {
     hwaddr phys_addr;
     target_ulong page_size;
     int prot;
-    int ret, is_user = ri->opc2 & 2;
-    int access_type = ri->opc2 & 1;
+    int ret;
     uint64_t par64;

     ret = get_phys_addr(env, value, access_type, is_user,
@@ -1481,9 +1481,28 @@ static void ats_write(CPUARMState *env, const ARMCPRegInfo *ri, uint64_t value)
                     ((ret & 0xf) << 1) | 1;
         }
     }
+    return par64;
+}
+
+static void ats_write(CPUARMState *env, const ARMCPRegInfo *ri, uint64_t value)
+{
+    int is_user = ri->opc2 & 2;
+    int access_type = ri->opc2 & 1;
+    uint64_t par64;
+
+    par64 = do_ats_write(env, value, access_type, is_user);

     A32_BANKED_CURRENT_REG_SET(env, par, par64);
 }
+
+static void ats_write64(CPUARMState *env, const ARMCPRegInfo *ri,
+                        uint64_t value)
+{
+    int is_user = ri->opc2 & 2;
+    int access_type = ri->opc2 & 1;
+
+    env->cp15.par_el[1] = do_ats_write(env, value, access_type, is_user);
+}
 #endif

 static const ARMCPRegInfo vapa_cp_reginfo[] = {
@@ -2257,16 +2276,16 @@ static const ARMCPRegInfo v8_cp_reginfo[] = {
     /* 64 bit address translation operations */
     { .name = "AT_S1E1R", .state = ARM_CP_STATE_AA64,
       .opc0 = 1, .opc1 = 0, .crn = 7, .crm = 8, .opc2 = 0,
-      .access = PL1_W, .type = ARM_CP_NO_MIGRATE, .writefn = ats_write },
+      .access = PL1_W, .type = ARM_CP_NO_MIGRATE, .writefn = ats_write64 },
     { .name = "AT_S1E1W", .state = ARM_CP_STATE_AA64,
       .opc0 = 1, .opc1 = 0, .crn = 7, .crm = 8, .opc2 = 1,
-      .access = PL1_W, .type = ARM_CP_NO_MIGRATE, .writefn = ats_write },
+      .access = PL1_W, .type = ARM_CP_NO_MIGRATE, .writefn = ats_write64 },
     { .name = "AT_S1E0R", .state = ARM_CP_STATE_AA64,
       .opc0 = 1, .opc1 = 0, .crn = 7, .crm = 8, .opc2 = 2,
-      .access = PL1_W, .type = ARM_CP_NO_MIGRATE, .writefn = ats_write },
+      .access = PL1_W, .type = ARM_CP_NO_MIGRATE, .writefn = ats_write64 },
     { .name = "AT_S1E0W", .state = ARM_CP_STATE_AA64,
       .opc0 = 1, .opc1 = 0, .crn = 7, .crm = 8, .opc2 = 3,
-      .access = PL1_W, .type = ARM_CP_NO_MIGRATE, .writefn = ats_write },
+      .access = PL1_W, .type = ARM_CP_NO_MIGRATE, .writefn = ats_write64 },
 #endif
     /* TLB invalidate last level of translation table walk */
     { .name = "TLBIMVALIS", .cp = 15, .opc1 = 0, .crn = 8, .crm = 3, .opc2 = 5,
--
1.9.1


​Reviewed-by: Greg Bellows <address@hidden>​


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]