qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 35/47] acpi: add acpi_reserved_field() term


From: Igor Mammedov
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 35/47] acpi: add acpi_reserved_field() term
Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2015 18:57:58 +0100

On Thu, 05 Feb 2015 17:36:16 +0200
Marcel Apfelbaum <address@hidden> wrote:

> On 01/22/2015 04:50 PM, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: Igor Mammedov <address@hidden>
> > ---
> >   hw/acpi/acpi-build-utils.c         | 10 ++++++++++
> >   include/hw/acpi/acpi-build-utils.h |  6 ++++++
> >   2 files changed, 16 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/hw/acpi/acpi-build-utils.c b/hw/acpi/acpi-build-utils.c
> > index cbc1241..644af1f 100644
> > --- a/hw/acpi/acpi-build-utils.c
> > +++ b/hw/acpi/acpi-build-utils.c
> > @@ -591,6 +591,16 @@ AcpiAml acpi_named_field(const char *name, unsigned 
> > length)
> >       return var;
> >   }
> >
> > +/* ACPI 5.0: 20.2.5.2 Named Objects Encoding: ReservedField */
> > +AcpiAml acpi_reserved_field(unsigned length)
> > +{
> > +    AcpiAml var = aml_allocate_internal(0, NON_BLOCK);
> > +    /* ReservedField  := 0x00 PkgLength */
> > +    build_append_byte(var.buf, 0x00);
> > +    build_append_pkg_length(var.buf, length, false);
> > +    return var;
> > +}
> > +
> >   /* ACPI 5.0: 20.2.5.2 Named Objects Encoding: DefField */
> >   AcpiAml acpi_field(const char *name, acpiFieldFlags flags)
> >   {
> > diff --git a/include/hw/acpi/acpi-build-utils.h 
> > b/include/hw/acpi/acpi-build-utils.h
> > index 02d5aa8..048ed26 100644
> > --- a/include/hw/acpi/acpi-build-utils.h
> > +++ b/include/hw/acpi/acpi-build-utils.h
> > @@ -25,7 +25,12 @@ typedef enum {
> >   } acpiIODecode;
>      ^^^
> >
> >   typedef enum {
> > +    acpi_any_acc = 0,
> >       acpi_byte_acc = 1,
> > +    acpi_word_acc = 2,
> > +    acpi_dword_acc = 3,
> > +    acpi_qword_acc = 4,
> > +    acpi_buffer_acc = 5,
> >   } acpiFieldFlags;
>       ^^^
> I missed that, is there any way it was like that already? Do we have such
> a coding convention on QEMU?
Fixed

> 
> Thanks,
> Marcel
> 
> >
> >   typedef enum {
> > @@ -58,6 +63,7 @@ AcpiAml acpi_io(acpiIODecode dec, uint16_t min_base, 
> > uint16_t max_base,
> >   AcpiAml acpi_operation_region(const char *name, acpiRegionSpace rs,
> >                                 uint32_t offset, uint32_t len);
> >   AcpiAml acpi_named_field(const char *name, unsigned length);
> > +AcpiAml acpi_reserved_field(unsigned length);
> >   AcpiAml GCC_FMT_ATTR(1, 2) acpi_string(const char *name_format, ...);
> >   AcpiAml acpi_local0(void);
> >   AcpiAml acpi_equal(AcpiAml arg1, AcpiAml arg2);
> >
> 




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]