qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2] qemu-coroutine: segfault when restarting co_


From: Bin Wu
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2] qemu-coroutine: segfault when restarting co_queue
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2015 08:55:50 +0800
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0

On 2015/2/9 17:09, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> 
> 
> On 09/02/2015 07:50, Bin Wu wrote:
>> From: Bin Wu <address@hidden>
>>
>> We tested VMs migration with their disk images by drive_mirror. With
>> migration, two VMs copyed large files between each other. During the
>> test, a segfault occured. The stack was as follow:
>>
>> (gdb) bt
>> qemu-coroutine-lock.c:66
>> to=0x7fa5a1798648) at qemu-coroutine.c:97
>> request=0x7fa28c2ffa10, reply=0x7fa28c2ffa30, qiov=0x0, offset=0) at
>> block/nbd-client.c:165
>> sector_num=8552704, nb_sectors=2040, qiov=0x7fa5a1757468, offset=0) at
>> block/nbd-client.c:262
>> sector_num=8552704, nb_sectors=2048, qiov=0x7fa5a1757468) at
>> block/nbd-client.c:296
>> nb_sectors=2048, qiov=0x7fa5a1757468) at block/nbd.c:291
>> req=0x7fa28c2ffbb0, offset=4378984448, bytes=1048576, qiov=0x7fa5a1757468,
>> flags=0) at block.c:3321
>> offset=4378984448, bytes=1048576, qiov=0x7fa5a1757468, flags=(unknown: 0)) at
>> block.c:3447
>> sector_num=8552704, nb_sectors=2048, qiov=0x7fa5a1757468, flags=(unknown: 
>> 0)) at
>> block.c:3471
>> nb_sectors=2048, qiov=0x7fa5a1757468) at block.c:3480
>> nb_sectors=2048, qiov=0x7fa5a1757468) at block/raw_bsd.c:62
>> req=0x7fa28c2ffe30, offset=4378984448, bytes=1048576, qiov=0x7fa5a1757468,
>> flags=0) at block.c:3321
>> offset=4378984448, bytes=1048576, qiov=0x7fa5a1757468, flags=(unknown: 0)) at
>> block.c:3447
>> sector_num=8552704, nb_sectors=2048, qiov=0x7fa5a1757468, flags=(unknown: 
>> 0)) at
>> block.c:3471
>> coroutine-ucontext.c:121
>>
>> After analyzing the stack and reviewing the code, we find the
>> qemu_co_queue_run_restart should not be put in the coroutine_swap function 
>> which
>> can be invoked by qemu_coroutine_enter or qemu_coroutine_yield. Only
>> qemu_coroutine_enter needs to restart the co_queue.
>>
>> The error scenario is as follow: coroutine C1 enters C2, C2 yields
>> back to C1, then C1 ternimates and the related coroutine memory
>> becomes invalid. After a while, the C2 coroutine is entered again.
>> At this point, C1 is used as a parameter passed to
>> qemu_co_queue_run_restart. Therefore, qemu_co_queue_run_restart
>> accesses an invalid memory and a segfault error ocurrs.
>>
>> The qemu_co_queue_run_restart function re-enters coroutines waiting
>> in the co_queue. However, this function should be only used int the
>> qemu_coroutine_enter context. Only in this context, when the current
>> coroutine gets execution control again(after the execution of
>> qemu_coroutine_switch), we can restart the target coutine because the
>> target coutine has yielded back to the current coroutine or it has
>> terminated.
> 
> qemu_coroutine_yield can be executed for other reasons than locks.  In
> those cases, it is correct to call qemu_co_queue_run_restart.  I think
> it's an NBD bug.
> 
> Paolo
> 

Maybe I didn't describe the error scenario clearly, but it's a normal coroutine
using case, not a NBD bug. Please reference stefan's reply, thanks.

>> First we want to put qemu_co_queue_run_restart in qemu_coroutine_enter,
>> but we find we can not access the target coroutine if it terminates.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Bin Wu <address@hidden>
>> ---
>>  qemu-coroutine.c | 16 ++++++++++------
>>  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/qemu-coroutine.c b/qemu-coroutine.c
>> index 525247b..cc0bdfa 100644
>> --- a/qemu-coroutine.c
>> +++ b/qemu-coroutine.c
>> @@ -99,29 +99,31 @@ static void coroutine_delete(Coroutine *co)
>>      qemu_coroutine_delete(co);
>>  }
>>  
>> -static void coroutine_swap(Coroutine *from, Coroutine *to)
>> +static CoroutineAction coroutine_swap(Coroutine *from, Coroutine *to)
>>  {
>>      CoroutineAction ret;
>>  
>>      ret = qemu_coroutine_switch(from, to, COROUTINE_YIELD);
>>  
>> -    qemu_co_queue_run_restart(to);
>> -
>>      switch (ret) {
>>      case COROUTINE_YIELD:
>> -        return;
>> +        break;
>>      case COROUTINE_TERMINATE:
>>          trace_qemu_coroutine_terminate(to);
>> +        qemu_co_queue_run_restart(to);
>>          coroutine_delete(to);
>> -        return;
>> +        break;
>>      default:
>>          abort();
>>      }
>> +
>> +    return ret;
>>  }
>>  
>>  void qemu_coroutine_enter(Coroutine *co, void *opaque)
>>  {
>>      Coroutine *self = qemu_coroutine_self();
>> +    CoroutineAction ret;
>>  
>>      trace_qemu_coroutine_enter(self, co, opaque);
>>  
>> @@ -132,7 +134,9 @@ void qemu_coroutine_enter(Coroutine *co, void *opaque)
>>  
>>      co->caller = self;
>>      co->entry_arg = opaque;
>> -    coroutine_swap(self, co);
>> +    ret = coroutine_swap(self, co);
>> +    if (ret == COROUTINE_YIELD)
>> +        qemu_co_queue_run_restart(co);
>>  }
>>  
>>  void coroutine_fn qemu_coroutine_yield(void)
>>
> 
> 
> .
> 

-- 
Bin Wu




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]