[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v1 2/2] zynq: Update Zynq to init the CPU in the
From: |
Peter Crosthwaite |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v1 2/2] zynq: Update Zynq to init the CPU in the a9mpcore device |
Date: |
Mon, 9 Feb 2015 22:45:16 -0800 |
On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 5:06 PM, Alistair Francis
<address@hidden> wrote:
> This patch removes the initialisation of the ARM Cortex-A9
> in Zynq and instead allows the a9mpcore device to init the
> CPU. This also updates components that rely on the CPU
> and GIC, as they are now initialised in a slightly different
> way
>
> Signed-off-by: Alistair Francis <address@hidden>
> ---
> Changes since RFC:
> - Rebase
>
> hw/arm/xilinx_zynq.c | 70 +++++++++++++++++++------------------------------
> 1 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 43 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/hw/arm/xilinx_zynq.c b/hw/arm/xilinx_zynq.c
> index 06e6e24..88d4473 100644
> --- a/hw/arm/xilinx_zynq.c
> +++ b/hw/arm/xilinx_zynq.c
> @@ -26,6 +26,7 @@
> #include "hw/loader.h"
> #include "hw/ssi.h"
> #include "qemu/error-report.h"
> +#include "hw/cpu/a9mpcore.h"
>
> #define NUM_SPI_FLASHES 4
> #define NUM_QSPI_FLASHES 2
> @@ -104,12 +105,10 @@ static inline void zynq_init_spi_flashes(uint32_t
> base_addr, qemu_irq irq,
> static void zynq_init(MachineState *machine)
> {
> ram_addr_t ram_size = machine->ram_size;
> - const char *cpu_model = machine->cpu_model;
> const char *kernel_filename = machine->kernel_filename;
> const char *kernel_cmdline = machine->kernel_cmdline;
> const char *initrd_filename = machine->initrd_filename;
> - ObjectClass *cpu_oc;
> - ARMCPU *cpu;
> + A9MPPrivState *mpcore;
> MemoryRegion *address_space_mem = get_system_memory();
> MemoryRegion *ext_ram = g_new(MemoryRegion, 1);
> MemoryRegion *ocm_ram = g_new(MemoryRegion, 1);
> @@ -119,39 +118,8 @@ static void zynq_init(MachineState *machine)
> Error *err = NULL;
> int n;
>
> - if (!cpu_model) {
> - cpu_model = "cortex-a9";
> - }
> - cpu_oc = cpu_class_by_name(TYPE_ARM_CPU, cpu_model);
> -
> - cpu = ARM_CPU(object_new(object_class_get_name(cpu_oc)));
> -
> - /* By default A9 CPUs have EL3 enabled. This board does not
> - * currently support EL3 so the CPU EL3 property is disabled before
> - * realization.
> - */
> - if (object_property_find(OBJECT(cpu), "has_el3", NULL)) {
> - object_property_set_bool(OBJECT(cpu), false, "has_el3", &err);
> - if (err) {
> - error_report("%s", error_get_pretty(err));
> - exit(1);
> - }
> - }
> -
> - object_property_set_int(OBJECT(cpu), ZYNQ_BOARD_MIDR, "midr", &err);
> - if (err) {
> - error_report("%s", error_get_pretty(err));
> - exit(1);
> - }
> -
> - object_property_set_int(OBJECT(cpu), MPCORE_PERIPHBASE, "reset-cbar",
> &err);
> - if (err) {
> - error_report("%s", error_get_pretty(err));
> - exit(1);
> - }
> - object_property_set_bool(OBJECT(cpu), true, "realized", &err);
> - if (err) {
> - error_report("%s", error_get_pretty(err));
> + if (machine->cpu_model) {
> + error_report("Zynq does not support CPU model override!\n");
> exit(1);
> }
>
> @@ -186,16 +154,32 @@ static void zynq_init(MachineState *machine)
> qdev_init_nofail(dev);
> sysbus_mmio_map(SYS_BUS_DEVICE(dev), 0, 0xF8000000);
>
> - dev = qdev_create(NULL, "a9mpcore_priv");
> - qdev_prop_set_uint32(dev, "num-cpu", 1);
> - qdev_init_nofail(dev);
> - busdev = SYS_BUS_DEVICE(dev);
> + mpcore = A9MPCORE_PRIV(object_new("a9mpcore_priv"));
> + /* By default A9 CPUs have EL3 enabled. This board does not
> + * currently support EL3 so the CPU EL3 property is disabled before
> + * realization.
> + */
> + if (object_property_find(OBJECT(mpcore), "has_el3", NULL)) {
With the defeaturing of cpu model override, I don't think this check
is needed anymore.
> + object_property_set_bool(OBJECT(mpcore), false, "has_el3", &err);
> + if (err) {
> + error_report("%s", error_get_pretty(err));
> + exit(1);
> + }
> + }
> + qdev_prop_set_uint32(DEVICE(mpcore), "num-cpu", 1);
Should this be before the el3 check. Otherwise will your aliases exist?
Regards,
Peter
> + qdev_prop_set_uint32(DEVICE(mpcore), "midr", ZYNQ_BOARD_MIDR);
> + qdev_prop_set_uint64(DEVICE(mpcore), "reset-cbar", MPCORE_PERIPHBASE);
> + object_property_set_bool(OBJECT(mpcore), true, "realized", &err);
> + if (err != NULL) {
> + error_report("Couldn't realize the Zynq A9MPCore: %s",
> + error_get_pretty(err));
> + exit(1);
> + }
> + busdev = SYS_BUS_DEVICE(DEVICE(mpcore));
> sysbus_mmio_map(busdev, 0, MPCORE_PERIPHBASE);
> - sysbus_connect_irq(busdev, 0,
> - qdev_get_gpio_in(DEVICE(cpu), ARM_CPU_IRQ));
>
> for (n = 0; n < 64; n++) {
> - pic[n] = qdev_get_gpio_in(dev, n);
> + pic[n] = qdev_get_gpio_in(DEVICE(mpcore), n);
> }
>
> zynq_init_spi_flashes(0xE0006000, pic[58-IRQ_OFFSET], false);
> --
> 1.7.1
>
>
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v1 2/2] zynq: Update Zynq to init the CPU in the a9mpcore device,
Peter Crosthwaite <=