qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC] net: 'Remove vhostforce option in addition to vho


From: Michael S. Tsirkin
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC] net: 'Remove vhostforce option in addition to vhost param'
Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2015 15:45:06 +0100

On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 07:02:43AM -0500, Pankaj Gupta wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Could you please help/guide me here. As suggested by Jason I did other 
> changes also.
> But when I did testing still virtio-net.c functions like 'receive()' gets 
> called when vhost is 'ON'.
> 
> I want to know is there anything I am missing here or is this expected 
> behaviour?

It's a known bug.

> I was also searching for "kvm eventfd support for injecting level-triggered 
> interrupts", For non-MSIX
> guests, can we remove vhost-force unless we have this feature?
> 
> Best regards,
> Pankaj

This feature is unused by vhost ATM.


> > From: "Jason Wang" <address@hidden>
> > To: "Pankaj Gupta" <address@hidden>
> > Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <address@hidden>, address@hidden, address@hidden, 
> > address@hidden
> > Sent: Sunday, February 15, 2015 8:11:29 AM
> > Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC] net: 'Remove vhostforce option in   
> > addition        to vhost param'
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 11:41 PM, Pankaj Gupta <address@hidden>
> > wrote:
> > >  
> > >>  
> > >>  > On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 11:50:05AM +0530, Pankaj Gupta wrote:
> > >>  > >  vhostforce was added to enable use of vhost when
> > >>  > >  guest don't have MSI-X support.
> > >>  > >  Now, we have scenarios which  dont use interrupts
> > >>  > >  like DPDK and still use vhost. Also, performance of
> > >>  > >  guests without MSI-X support is getting less popular.
> > >>  > > 
> > >>  > >  Its ok to remove this extra option and enable vhost
> > >>  > >  on the basis of vhost=ON/OFF.
> > >>  > > 
> > >>  > > Signed-off-by: Pankaj Gupta <address@hidden>
> > >>  > 
> > >>  > The patch doesn't seem to do what it says.
> > >>  > Did you try with a non MSIX guest and vhost=on, to check that
> > >>  > it actually runs vhost and not userspace virtio?
> > >>  
> > >>  No, I have not. I just did basic tested a new guest without
> > >> vhostforce.
> > >>  I will test non-MSIX guest and share the result.
> > > 
> > > I tested this with RHEL 4 guest which don't have MSI-X. Though vhost
> > > gets
> > > created but still userspace virtio-net code executes.
> > > 
> > > So, vhostforce was added to disable vhost for non-MSI guest?
> > 
> > In fact to enable vhost.
> > > 
> > > I took the idea from KVM/Networking todo list.
> > > 
> > > Do we have some other dependency before we want to remove vhostforce?
> > >   
> > 
> > You may want to take a look at the vhost_dev->force and
> > vhost_dev_query().
> > > 
> > >>  
> > >>  > 
> > >>  > > ---
> > >>  > >  net/tap.c        |  4 +---
> > >>  > >  net/vhost-user.c | 16 ++--------------
> > >>  > >  2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
> > >>  > > 
> > >>  > > diff --git a/net/tap.c b/net/tap.c
> > >>  > > index 1fe0edf..bd2efa9 100644
> > >>  > > --- a/net/tap.c
> > >>  > > +++ b/net/tap.c
> > >>  > > @@ -634,13 +634,11 @@ static int net_init_tap_one(const
> > >> NetdevTapOptions
> > >>  > > *tap, NetClientState *peer,
> > >>  > >          }
> > >>  > >      }
> > >>  > >  
> > >>  > > -    if (tap->has_vhost ? tap->vhost :
> > >>  > > -        vhostfdname || (tap->has_vhostforce &&
> > >> tap->vhostforce)) {
> > >>  > > +    if (tap->has_vhost ? tap->vhost : vhostfdname) {
> > >>  > >          VhostNetOptions options;
> > >>  > >  
> > >>  > >          options.backend_type = VHOST_BACKEND_TYPE_KERNEL;
> > >>  > >          options.net_backend = &s->nc;
> > >>  > > -        options.force = tap->has_vhostforce && tap->vhostforce;
> > >>  > >  
> > >>  > >          if (tap->has_vhostfd || tap->has_vhostfds) {
> > >>  > >              vhostfd = monitor_handle_fd_param(cur_mon,
> > >> vhostfdname);
> > >>  > > diff --git a/net/vhost-user.c b/net/vhost-user.c
> > >>  > > index 24e050c..d2d7bf2 100644
> > >>  > > --- a/net/vhost-user.c
> > >>  > > +++ b/net/vhost-user.c
> > >>  > > @@ -18,7 +18,6 @@
> > >>  > >  typedef struct VhostUserState {
> > >>  > >      NetClientState nc;
> > >>  > >      CharDriverState *chr;
> > >>  > > -    bool vhostforce;
> > >>  > >      VHostNetState *vhost_net;
> > >>  > >  } VhostUserState;
> > >>  > >  
> > >>  > > @@ -51,7 +50,6 @@ static int vhost_user_start(VhostUserState *s)
> > >>  > >      options.backend_type = VHOST_BACKEND_TYPE_USER;
> > >>  > >      options.net_backend = &s->nc;
> > >>  > >      options.opaque = s->chr;
> > >>  > > -    options.force = s->vhostforce;
> > >>  > >  
> > >>  > >      s->vhost_net = vhost_net_init(&options);
> > >>  > >  
> > >>  > > @@ -133,8 +131,7 @@ static void net_vhost_user_event(void
> > >> *opaque, int
> > >>  > > event)
> > >>  > >  }
> > >>  > >  
> > >>  > >  static int net_vhost_user_init(NetClientState *peer, const
> > >> char *device,
> > >>  > > -                               const char *name,
> > >> CharDriverState *chr,
> > >>  > > -                               bool vhostforce)
> > >>  > > +                               const char *name,
> > >> CharDriverState *chr)
> > >>  > >  {
> > >>  > >      NetClientState *nc;
> > >>  > >      VhostUserState *s;
> > >>  > > @@ -149,7 +146,6 @@ static int
> > >> net_vhost_user_init(NetClientState *peer,
> > >>  > > const char *device,
> > >>  > >      /* We don't provide a receive callback */
> > >>  > >      s->nc.receive_disabled = 1;
> > >>  > >      s->chr = chr;
> > >>  > > -    s->vhostforce = vhostforce;
> > >>  > >  
> > >>  > >      qemu_chr_add_handlers(s->chr, NULL, NULL,
> > >> net_vhost_user_event, s);
> > >>  > >  
> > >>  > > @@ -230,7 +226,6 @@ int net_init_vhost_user(const
> > >> NetClientOptions *opts,
> > >>  > > const char *name,
> > >>  > >  {
> > >>  > >      const NetdevVhostUserOptions *vhost_user_opts;
> > >>  > >      CharDriverState *chr;
> > >>  > > -    bool vhostforce;
> > >>  > >  
> > >>  > >      assert(opts->kind == NET_CLIENT_OPTIONS_KIND_VHOST_USER);
> > >>  > >      vhost_user_opts = opts->vhost_user;
> > >>  > > @@ -247,12 +242,5 @@ int net_init_vhost_user(const
> > >> NetClientOptions
> > >>  > > *opts,
> > >>  > > const char *name,
> > >>  > >          return -1;
> > >>  > >      }
> > >>  > >  
> > >>  > > -    /* vhostforce for non-MSIX */
> > >>  > > -    if (vhost_user_opts->has_vhostforce) {
> > >>  > > -        vhostforce = vhost_user_opts->vhostforce;
> > >>  > > -    } else {
> > >>  > > -        vhostforce = false;
> > >>  > > -    }
> > >>  > > -
> > >>  > > -    return net_vhost_user_init(peer, "vhost_user", name, chr,
> > >>  > > vhostforce);
> > >>  > > +    return net_vhost_user_init(peer, "vhost_user", name, chr);
> > >>  > >  }
> > >>  > > --
> > >>  > > 1.8.3.1
> > >>  > 
> > >>  > 
> > >>  
> > > 
> > 
> > 



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]