qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/4] migration: Convert bdrv_find to blk_by_name


From: Max Reitz
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/4] migration: Convert bdrv_find to blk_by_name
Date: Mon, 02 Mar 2015 10:32:29 -0500
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.5.0

On 2015-03-02 at 06:36, Fam Zheng wrote:
Signed-off-by: Fam Zheng <address@hidden>
---
  migration/block.c | 7 +++++--
  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/migration/block.c b/migration/block.c
index 0c76106..085c0fa 100644
--- a/migration/block.c
+++ b/migration/block.c
@@ -23,6 +23,7 @@
  #include "migration/block.h"
  #include "migration/migration.h"
  #include "sysemu/blockdev.h"
+#include "sysemu/block-backend.h"
  #include <assert.h>
#define BLOCK_SIZE (1 << 20)
@@ -783,6 +784,7 @@ static int block_load(QEMUFile *f, void *opaque, int 
version_id)
      char device_name[256];
      int64_t addr;
      BlockDriverState *bs, *bs_prev = NULL;
+    BlockBackend *blk;
      uint8_t *buf;
      int64_t total_sectors = 0;
      int nr_sectors;
@@ -800,12 +802,13 @@ static int block_load(QEMUFile *f, void *opaque, int 
version_id)
              qemu_get_buffer(f, (uint8_t *)device_name, len);
              device_name[len] = '\0';
- bs = bdrv_find(device_name);
-            if (!bs) {
+            blk = blk_by_name(device_name);
+            if (!blk) {
                  fprintf(stderr, "Error unknown block device %s\n",
                          device_name);
                  return -EINVAL;
              }
+            bs = blk_bs(blk);
if (bs != bs_prev) {
                  bs_prev = bs;

Hm, okay for a quick stitch. But actually we could get rid of all the BDSs in this function (and it should probably be acquiring the AioContext of the BB). If you don't feel like it, maybe I'll do it in the next iteration of my "BB and media" series (or in the bdrv_close_all() series... Both have convenient "Use more BB" patches, as far as I remember).

Reviewed-by: Max Reitz <address@hidden>



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]