Am 04.03.2015 um 15:24 hat Max Reitz geschrieben:
On 2015-03-04 at 09:20, Kevin Wolf wrote:
Am 04.03.2015 um 15:07 hat Max Reitz geschrieben:
On 2015-03-04 at 09:02, Kevin Wolf wrote:
Am 09.02.2015 um 18:11 hat Max Reitz geschrieben:
Only call bdrv_key_required() on the BlockDriverState if the
BlockBackend has an inserted medium.
Signed-off-by: Max Reitz <address@hidden>
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <address@hidden>
---
hw/usb/dev-storage.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/hw/usb/dev-storage.c b/hw/usb/dev-storage.c
index 4539733..3123baf 100644
--- a/hw/usb/dev-storage.c
+++ b/hw/usb/dev-storage.c
@@ -638,7 +638,7 @@ static void usb_msd_realize_storage(USBDevice *dev, Error
**errp)
usb_msd_handle_reset(dev);
s->scsi_dev = scsi_dev;
- if (bdrv_key_required(blk_bs(blk))) {
+ if (blk_is_inserted(blk) && bdrv_key_required(blk_bs(blk))) {
if (cur_mon) {
monitor_read_bdrv_key_start(cur_mon, blk_bs(blk),
usb_msd_password_cb, s);
Why would bdrv_key_required() ever return true when no medium is
inserted? Sounds like a bug to me, like not resetting state correctly on
bdrv_close() of an encrypted image.
The point is that blk_bs(blk) might be NULL.
This is not what blk_is_inserted() is checking. It happens to protect
you against segfaults because it's robust against using NULL, but with
an existing BDS, checking whether there is a medium inserted (in the
physical device for passthrough drivers) doesn't make sense.
Not right now it's not. See patch 6.
Patch 6 looks unrelated, at least in v2. But if you're trying to say
that I looked at the wrong version, you're right: It doesn't protect you
against segfaults at this point yet (which is okay, because blk->bs
can't be NULL yet), it only performs the misguided inserted check.