qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V3 06/14] virtio-serial-bus: switch to bus speci


From: Cornelia Huck
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V3 06/14] virtio-serial-bus: switch to bus specific queue limit
Date: Fri, 6 Mar 2015 13:27:12 +0100

On Thu,  5 Mar 2015 13:48:43 +0800
Jason Wang <address@hidden> wrote:

> Cc: Amit Shah <address@hidden>
> Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <address@hidden>
> ---
>  hw/char/virtio-serial-bus.c | 4 +++-
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/hw/char/virtio-serial-bus.c b/hw/char/virtio-serial-bus.c
> index 37a6f44..f280e95 100644
> --- a/hw/char/virtio-serial-bus.c
> +++ b/hw/char/virtio-serial-bus.c
> @@ -26,6 +26,8 @@
>  #include "hw/virtio/virtio-serial.h"
>  #include "hw/virtio/virtio-access.h"
> 
> +#define VIRTIO_SERIAL_BUS_QUEUE_MAX 64
> +
>  struct VirtIOSerialDevices {
>      QLIST_HEAD(, VirtIOSerial) devices;
>  } vserdevices;
> @@ -942,7 +944,7 @@ static void virtio_serial_device_realize(DeviceState 
> *dev, Error **errp)
>      }
> 
>      /* Each port takes 2 queues, and one pair is for the control queue */
> -    max_supported_ports = VIRTIO_PCI_QUEUE_MAX / 2 - 1;
> +    max_supported_ports = VIRTIO_SERIAL_BUS_QUEUE_MAX / 2 - 1;

Shouldn't this be determined via the VirtIODevice instead? Or be the
maximum of those two values?

> 
>      if (vser->serial.max_virtserial_ports > max_supported_ports) {
>          error_setg(errp, "maximum ports supported: %u", max_supported_ports);




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]