qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] qemu-m68k: add support for interrupt masking/un


From: Peter Maydell
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] qemu-m68k: add support for interrupt masking/unmasking
Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2015 11:40:52 +0000

On 22 March 2015 at 09:09, Waldemar Brodkorb <address@hidden> wrote:
> Fixes following problem, when trying to boot linux:
> qemu: hardware error: mcf_intc_write: Bad write offset 28
>
> CPU #0:
> D0 = 000000ff   A0 = 402ea5dc   F0 = 0000000000000000 (           0)
> D1 = 00000004   A1 = 402ea5e0   F1 = 0000000000000000 (           0)
> D2 = 00000040   A2 = 40040752   F2 = 0000000000000000 (           0)
> D3 = 00000000   A3 = 40040a98   F3 = 0000000000000000 (           0)
> D4 = 00000000   A4 = 400407b4   F4 = 0000000000000000 (           0)
> D5 = 00000000   A5 = 00000000   F5 = 0000000000000000 (           0)
> D6 = 00000000   A6 = 40195ff8   F6 = 0000000000000000 (           0)
> D7 = 00000000   A7 = 40195fd0   F7 = 0000000000000000 (           0)
> PC = 401b2058   SR = 2704 --Z-- FPRESULT =            0
> Aborted
>
> System started via:
> qemu-system-m68k -nographic -nographic -M mcf5208evb -cpu m5208 -kernel kernel
>
> Patch originally posted here:
> http://lists.busybox.net/pipermail/buildroot/2012-April/052585.html
>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <address@hidden>
> Tested-by: Waldemar Brodkorb <address@hidden>
> Signed-off-by: Waldemar Brodkorb <address@hidden>
> ---
>  hw/m68k/mcf_intc.c |   18 ++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 18 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/hw/m68k/mcf_intc.c b/hw/m68k/mcf_intc.c
> index 621423c..1d161b1 100644
> --- a/hw/m68k/mcf_intc.c
> +++ b/hw/m68k/mcf_intc.c
> @@ -65,6 +65,10 @@ static uint64_t mcf_intc_read(void *opaque, hwaddr addr,
>          return (uint32_t)(s->ifr >> 32);
>      case 0x14:
>          return (uint32_t)s->ifr;
> +    /* Reading from SIMR and CIMR return 0 */
> +    case 0x1c:
> +    case 0x1d:
> +       return 0;
>      case 0xe0: /* SWIACK.  */
>          return s->active_vector;
>      case 0xe1: case 0xe2: case 0xe3: case 0xe4:
> @@ -102,6 +106,20 @@ static void mcf_intc_write(void *opaque, hwaddr addr,
>      case 0x0c:
>          s->imr = (s->imr & 0xffffffff00000000ull) | (uint32_t)val;
>          break;
> +    /* SIMR allows to easily mask interrupts */
> +    case 0x1c:
> +       if (val & 0x40)
> +               s->imr = ~0ull;
> +       else
> +               s->imr |= (1 << (val & 0x3f));

This is undefined behaviour for large values of
'val' because 1 is only an int type and we might
try to shift it by more than 30. You need a ULL
suffix on the 1.

> +       break;
> +    /* CIMR allows to easily unmask interrupts */
> +    case 0x1d:
> +       if (val & 0x40)
> +               s->imr = 0ull;
> +       else
> +               s->imr &= ~(1 << (val & 0x3f));
> +       break;
>      default:
>          hw_error("mcf_intc_write: Bad write offset %d\n", offset);
>          break;

thanks
-- PMM



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]