Re: [Qemu-devel] GSoC Proposal: ARM Virtualization Extensions

[Merten Sach]

On 20/03/15 18:44, Peter Maydell wrote:
>  * having a project plan that divides the work up into small
>    but coherent chunks that can be landed upstream incrementally
>    (to avoid the failure mode of "work all summer but don't
>    get it finished, and so don't have anything concrete
>    to show for it at the end")

Hi,

what is the policy for incomplete specification implementations?
For example, I could imagine implementing mode switches and exception routing
without nested paging (though Sergey already implemented it). This would not be
sufficient to run KVM. However one could test it.

Best regards,
Merten