qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 3/3] TPM2 ACPI table support


From: Michael S. Tsirkin
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 3/3] TPM2 ACPI table support
Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2015 08:27:52 +0200

> @@ -1428,12 +1444,22 @@ void acpi_build(PcGuestInfo *guest_info, 
> AcpiBuildTables *tables)
>          acpi_add_table(table_offsets, tables_blob);
>          build_hpet(tables_blob, tables->linker);
>      }
> -    if (misc.has_tpm) {
> +    if (misc.tpm_version != TPMVersion_Unspec) {
>          acpi_add_table(table_offsets, tables_blob);
>          build_tpm_tcpa(tables_blob, tables->linker, tables->tcpalog);
>  
>          acpi_add_table(table_offsets, tables_blob);
> -        build_tpm_ssdt(tables_blob, tables->linker);
> +        switch (misc.tpm_version) {
> +        case TPMVersion1_2:
> +            build_tpm_ssdt(tables_blob, tables->linker);
> +            break;
> +        case TPMVersion2_0:
> +            build_tpm2(tables_blob, tables->linker);
> +            break;
> +        case TPMVersion_Unspec:
> +            /* not possible */
> +            break;
> +        }
>      }
>      if (guest_info->numa_nodes) {
>          acpi_add_table(table_offsets, tables_blob);

I think we should fix QEMU coding style violations in TPM code.
In particular, mixing of _ and camel case, enum and define values
not all upper case, local variables not all lower case.
This was less of an issue when the violations were contained
within hw/tpm/, but it's more of an issue now that this affects
other code.

-- 
MST



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]