[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] kvm: Silence warning from valgrind
|
From: |
Michael Tokarev |
|
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] kvm: Silence warning from valgrind |
|
Date: |
Wed, 29 Apr 2015 09:50:40 +0300 |
|
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/31.6.0 |
29.04.2015 09:43, Thomas Huth wrote:
> On Wed, 29 Apr 2015 09:34:51 +0300
> Michael Tokarev <address@hidden> wrote:
[]
>> Hm. So, what's the difference? The same fields are assigned the same
>> values, why in first case we have some uninitialized data and in second
>> case everything is initialized? Does struct initializer zero-fills all
>> other places (alignments, missing fields etc) ?
>
> Right, the struct initializer fills the remaining fields with zeros.
Okay, point taken. I just didn't know.
>> If yes, there's no need to assign zero to flags, btw ;)
>
> True. Shall I sent a patch without that line?
I think it is better for readability to have it in.
Applied to -trivial, thank you!
/mjt