qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 3/5] raw-posix: DPRINTF instead of DEBUG_BLOCK_PR


From: Dimitris Aragiorgis
Subject: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 3/5] raw-posix: DPRINTF instead of DEBUG_BLOCK_PRINT
Date: Fri, 8 May 2015 20:47:20 +0300

Building the QEMU tools fails if we #define DEBUG_BLOCK inside
block/raw-posix.c. Here instead of adding qemu-log.o in block-obj-y
so that DEBUG_BLOCK_PRINT can be used, we substitute the latter with
a simple DPRINTF().

Signed-off-by: Dimitris Aragiorgis <address@hidden>
---
 block/raw-posix.c |   12 ++++++------
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/block/raw-posix.c b/block/raw-posix.c
index 24b061f..fbccca8 100644
--- a/block/raw-posix.c
+++ b/block/raw-posix.c
@@ -97,11 +97,11 @@
 //#define DEBUG_FLOPPY
 
 //#define DEBUG_BLOCK
-#if defined(DEBUG_BLOCK)
-#define DEBUG_BLOCK_PRINT(formatCstr, ...) do { if (qemu_log_enabled()) \
-    { qemu_log(formatCstr, ## __VA_ARGS__); qemu_log_flush(); } } while (0)
+
+#ifdef DEBUG_BLOCK
+#define DPRINTF(fmt, ...) do { printf(fmt, ## __VA_ARGS__); } while (0)
 #else
-#define DEBUG_BLOCK_PRINT(formatCstr, ...)
+#define DPRINTF(fmt, ...) do { } while (0)
 #endif
 
 /* OS X does not have O_DSYNC */
@@ -1023,7 +1023,7 @@ static int xfs_write_zeroes(BDRVRawState *s, int64_t 
offset, uint64_t bytes)
     fl.l_len = bytes;
 
     if (xfsctl(NULL, s->fd, XFS_IOC_ZERO_RANGE, &fl) < 0) {
-        DEBUG_BLOCK_PRINT("cannot write zero range (%s)\n", strerror(errno));
+        DPRINTF("cannot write zero range (%s)\n", strerror(errno));
         return -errno;
     }
 
@@ -1040,7 +1040,7 @@ static int xfs_discard(BDRVRawState *s, int64_t offset, 
uint64_t bytes)
     fl.l_len = bytes;
 
     if (xfsctl(NULL, s->fd, XFS_IOC_UNRESVSP64, &fl) < 0) {
-        DEBUG_BLOCK_PRINT("cannot punch hole (%s)\n", strerror(errno));
+        DPRINTF("cannot punch hole (%s)\n", strerror(errno));
         return -errno;
     }
 
-- 
1.7.10.4




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]