qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v7 14/23] hw/acpi/aml-build: Add ToUUID macro


From: Shannon Zhao
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v7 14/23] hw/acpi/aml-build: Add ToUUID macro
Date: Tue, 19 May 2015 08:41:39 +0800
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.6.0


On 2015/5/19 0:17, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 05:19:33PM +0800, Shannon Zhao wrote:
>> > From: Shannon Zhao <address@hidden>
>> > 
>> > Add ToUUID macro, this is useful for generating PCIe ACPI table.
>> > 
>> > Signed-off-by: Shannon Zhao <address@hidden>
>> > Signed-off-by: Shannon Zhao <address@hidden>
>> > ---
>> >  hw/acpi/aml-build.c         | 46 
>> > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> >  include/hw/acpi/aml-build.h |  1 +
>> >  2 files changed, 47 insertions(+)
>> > 
>> > diff --git a/hw/acpi/aml-build.c b/hw/acpi/aml-build.c
>> > index 6197896..0e4d35f 100644
>> > --- a/hw/acpi/aml-build.c
>> > +++ b/hw/acpi/aml-build.c
>> > @@ -956,6 +956,52 @@ Aml *aml_qword_memory(AmlDecode dec, AmlMinFixed 
>> > min_fixed,
>> >                               addr_trans, len, flags);
>> >  }
>> >  
>> > +static uint8_t Hex2Byte(const char *src)
>> > +{
>> > +    int hi = Hex2Digit(*src++);
>> > +    int lo = Hex2Digit(*src);
> 
> Just src[0] src[1] would be clearer.
> 
>> > +
>> > +    g_assert(((hi >= 0) && (hi <= 15)) && ((lo >= 0) && (lo <= 15)));
> Pls use simple assert everywhere, it does not matter
> and rest of acpi uses plain assert.
> 
>> > +    return (hi << 4) | lo;
>> > +}
> Really should be lower-case. We need to fix Hex2Digit too,
> but since Hex2Digit is broken, I'll let this one in
> and we can fix both with a patch on top.
> 
>> > +
>> > +/*
>> > + * ACPI 3.0: 17.5.124 ToUUID (Convert String to UUID Macro)
>> > + * e.g. UUID: aabbccdd-eeff-gghh-iijj-kkllmmnnoopp
>> > + * call aml_touuid("aabbccdd-eeff-gghh-iijj-kkllmmnnoopp");
>> > + */
>> > +Aml *aml_touuid(const char *uuid)
>> > +{
>> > +    Aml *var = aml_bundle(0x11 /* BufferOp */, AML_BUFFER);
>> > +
>> > +    /* format: aabbccdd-eeff-gghh-iijj-kkllmmnnoopp */
> This documents the argument, so really belongs near the
> function's head.
> 
>> > +    g_assert((strlen(uuid) == 36) && (uuid[8] == '-') && (uuid[13] == '-')
>> > +              && (uuid[18] == '-') && (uuid[23] == '-'));
> Does something else validate the parameter?
> It's not friendly to handle errors by assert.
> Why doesn't that something else give us a pre-parse structure then?
> 

a pre-parse structure?

> 
>> > +
>> > +    build_append_byte(var->buf, Hex2Byte(uuid + 6)); /* dd - at offset 00 
>> > */
>> > +    build_append_byte(var->buf, Hex2Byte(uuid + 4)); /* cc - at offset 01 
>> > */
>> > +    build_append_byte(var->buf, Hex2Byte(uuid + 2)); /* bb - at offset 02 
>> > */
>> > +    build_append_byte(var->buf, Hex2Byte(uuid + 0)); /* aa - at offset 03 
>> > */
>> > +
>> > +    build_append_byte(var->buf, Hex2Byte(uuid + 11)); /* ff - at offset 
>> > 04 */
>> > +    build_append_byte(var->buf, Hex2Byte(uuid + 9)); /* ee - at offset 05 
>> > */
>> > +
>> > +    build_append_byte(var->buf, Hex2Byte(uuid + 16)); /* hh - at offset 
>> > 06 */
>> > +    build_append_byte(var->buf, Hex2Byte(uuid + 14)); /* gg - at offset 
>> > 07 */
>> > +
>> > +    build_append_byte(var->buf, Hex2Byte(uuid + 19)); /* ii - at offset 
>> > 08 */
>> > +    build_append_byte(var->buf, Hex2Byte(uuid + 21)); /* jj - at offset 
>> > 09 */
>> > +
>> > +    build_append_byte(var->buf, Hex2Byte(uuid + 24)); /* kk - at offset 
>> > 10 */
>> > +    build_append_byte(var->buf, Hex2Byte(uuid + 26)); /* ll - at offset 
>> > 11 */
>> > +    build_append_byte(var->buf, Hex2Byte(uuid + 28)); /* mm - at offset 
>> > 12 */
>> > +    build_append_byte(var->buf, Hex2Byte(uuid + 30)); /* nn - at offset 
>> > 13 */
>> > +    build_append_byte(var->buf, Hex2Byte(uuid + 32)); /* oo - at offset 
>> > 14 */
>> > +    build_append_byte(var->buf, Hex2Byte(uuid + 34)); /* pp - at offset 
>> > 15 */
> Can we use strtoull?
> 

Igor and I have a discussion on this. I used strtol before and we got an
agreement on current approach.

-- 
Shannon



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]