qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 14/14] target-arm: Add WFx instruction trap supp


From: Edgar E. Iglesias
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 14/14] target-arm: Add WFx instruction trap support
Date: Thu, 28 May 2015 15:59:12 +1000
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)

On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 07:33:34PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
> From: Greg Bellows <address@hidden>
> 
> Add support for trapping WFI and WFE instructions to the proper EL when
> SCTLR/SCR/HCR settings apply.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Greg Bellows <address@hidden>
> [PMM: removed unnecessary tweaking of syn_wfx() prototype;
>  use raise_exception();
>  don't trap on WFE (and add comment explaining why not);
>  remove unnecessary ARM_FEATURE checks;
>  trap to EL3, not EL1, if in S-EL0 and SCTLR check fires]
> Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <address@hidden>


Reviewed-by: Edgar E. Iglesias <address@hidden>


> ---
>  target-arm/op_helper.c | 60 
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 59 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/target-arm/op_helper.c b/target-arm/op_helper.c
> index 517dacc..c5ba9f0 100644
> --- a/target-arm/op_helper.c
> +++ b/target-arm/op_helper.c
> @@ -248,9 +248,60 @@ uint32_t HELPER(usat16)(CPUARMState *env, uint32_t x, 
> uint32_t shift)
>      return res;
>  }
>  
> +/* Function checks whether WFx (WFI/WFE) instructions are set up to be 
> trapped.
> + * The function returns the target EL (1-3) if the instruction is to be 
> trapped;
> + * otherwise it returns 0 indicating it is not trapped.
> + */
> +static inline int check_wfx_trap(CPUARMState *env, bool is_wfe)
> +{
> +    int cur_el = arm_current_el(env);
> +    uint64_t mask;
> +
> +    /* If we are currently in EL0 then we need to check if SCTLR is set up 
> for
> +     * WFx instructions being trapped to EL1. These trap bits don't exist in 
> v7.
> +     */
> +    if (cur_el < 1 && arm_feature(env, ARM_FEATURE_V8)) {
> +        int target_el;
> +
> +        mask = is_wfe ? SCTLR_nTWE : SCTLR_nTWI;
> +        if (arm_is_secure_below_el3(env) && !arm_el_is_aa64(env, 3)) {
> +            /* Secure EL0 and Secure PL1 is at EL3 */
> +            target_el = 3;
> +        } else {
> +            target_el = 1;
> +        }
> +
> +        if (!(env->cp15.sctlr_el[target_el] & mask)) {
> +            return target_el;
> +        }
> +    }
> +
> +    /* We are not trapping to EL1; trap to EL2 if HCR_EL2 requires it
> +     * No need for ARM_FEATURE check as if HCR_EL2 doesn't exist the
> +     * bits will be zero indicating no trap.
> +     */
> +    if (cur_el < 2 && !arm_is_secure(env)) {
> +        mask = (is_wfe) ? HCR_TWE : HCR_TWI;
> +        if (env->cp15.hcr_el2 & mask) {
> +            return 2;
> +        }
> +    }
> +
> +    /* We are not trapping to EL1 or EL2; trap to EL3 if SCR_EL3 requires it 
> */
> +    if (cur_el < 3) {
> +        mask = (is_wfe) ? SCR_TWE : SCR_TWI;
> +        if (env->cp15.scr_el3 & mask) {
> +            return 3;
> +        }
> +    }
> +
> +    return 0;
> +}
> +
>  void HELPER(wfi)(CPUARMState *env)
>  {
>      CPUState *cs = CPU(arm_env_get_cpu(env));
> +    int target_el = check_wfx_trap(env, false);
>  
>      if (cpu_has_work(cs)) {
>          /* Don't bother to go into our "low power state" if
> @@ -259,6 +310,11 @@ void HELPER(wfi)(CPUARMState *env)
>          return;
>      }
>  
> +    if (target_el) {
> +        env->pc -= 4;
> +        raise_exception(env, EXCP_UDEF, syn_wfx(1, 0xe, 0), target_el);
> +    }
> +
>      cs->exception_index = EXCP_HLT;
>      cs->halted = 1;
>      cpu_loop_exit(cs);
> @@ -269,7 +325,9 @@ void HELPER(wfe)(CPUARMState *env)
>      CPUState *cs = CPU(arm_env_get_cpu(env));
>  
>      /* Don't actually halt the CPU, just yield back to top
> -     * level loop
> +     * level loop. This is not going into a "low power state"
> +     * (ie halting until some event occurs), so we never take
> +     * a configurable trap to a different exception level.
>       */
>      cs->exception_index = EXCP_YIELD;
>      cpu_loop_exit(cs);
> -- 
> 1.9.1
> 



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]