[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] Use Aff1 with mpidr
From: |
Igor Mammedov |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] Use Aff1 with mpidr |
Date: |
Fri, 29 May 2015 10:36:52 +0200 |
On Fri, 22 May 2015 13:32:54 +0300
Pavel Fedin <address@hidden> wrote:
> This is an improved and KVM-aware alternative to
> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2015-05/msg00942.html. Changes
> are:
> 1. MPIDR value (minus feature bits) is now directly stored in CPU instance.
> 2. Default assignment is based on original rule (8 CPUs per cluster).
> 3. If KVM is used, MPIDR values are overridden with those from KVM. This is
> necessary for
> proper KVM PSCI functioning.
> 4. Some cosmetic changes which would make further expansion of this code
> easier.
> 5. Added some debugging macros because CPU ID assignment is tricky part, and
> if there are
> some problems, i think there should be a quick way to make sure they are
> correct.
> This does not have an RFC mark because it is perfectly okay to be committed
> alone, it
> does not break anything. Commit message follows. Cc'ed to all interested
> parties because i
> really hope to get things going somewhere this time.
>
> In order to support up to 128 cores with GIC-500 (GICv3 implementation)
> affinity1 must be used. GIC-500 support up to 32 clusters with up to
> 8 cores in a cluster. So for example, if one wishes to have 16 cores,
> the options are: 2 clusters of 8 cores each, 4 clusters with 4 cores each
> Currently only the first option is supported for TCG. However, KVM expects
> to have the same clusters layout as host machine has. Therefore, if we use
> 64-bit KVM we override CPU IDs with those provided by the KVM. For 32-bit
> systems it is OK to leave the default because so far we do not have more
> than 8 CPUs on any of them.
> This implementation has a potential to be extended with some methods which
> would define cluster layout instead of hardcoded CPUS_PER_CLUSTER
> definition. This would allow to emulate real machines with different
> layouts. However, in case of KVM we would still have to inherit IDs from
> the host.
>
> Signed-off-by: Shlomo Pongratz <address@hidden>
> Signed-off-by: Pavel Fedin <address@hidden>
> ---
> hw/arm/virt.c | 6 +++++-
> target-arm/cpu-qom.h | 3 +++
> target-arm/cpu.c | 17 +++++++++++++++++
> target-arm/helper.c | 9 +++------
> target-arm/kvm64.c | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
> target-arm/psci.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++--
> 6 files changed, 71 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/hw/arm/virt.c b/hw/arm/virt.c
> index a7f9a10..a1186c5 100644
> --- a/hw/arm/virt.c
> +++ b/hw/arm/virt.c
> @@ -317,7 +317,11 @@ static void fdt_add_cpu_nodes(const VirtBoardInfo *vbi)
> "enable-method", "psci");
> }
>
> - qemu_fdt_setprop_cell(vbi->fdt, nodename, "reg", cpu);
> + /*
> + * If cpus node's #address-cells property is set to 1
> + * The reg cell bits [23:0] must be set to bits [23:0] of MPIDR_EL1.
> + */
> + qemu_fdt_setprop_cell(vbi->fdt, nodename, "reg", armcpu->mpidr);
> g_free(nodename);
> }
> }
> diff --git a/target-arm/cpu-qom.h b/target-arm/cpu-qom.h
> index ed5a644..a382a09 100644
> --- a/target-arm/cpu-qom.h
> +++ b/target-arm/cpu-qom.h
> @@ -159,6 +159,7 @@ typedef struct ARMCPU {
> uint64_t id_aa64mmfr1;
> uint32_t dbgdidr;
> uint32_t clidr;
> + uint64_t mpidr; /* Without feature bits */
> /* The elements of this array are the CCSIDR values for each cache,
> * in the order L1DCache, L1ICache, L2DCache, L2ICache, etc.
> */
> @@ -171,6 +172,8 @@ typedef struct ARMCPU {
> uint64_t rvbar;
> } ARMCPU;
>
> +#define CPUS_PER_CLUSTER 8
> +
> #define TYPE_AARCH64_CPU "aarch64-cpu"
> #define AARCH64_CPU_CLASS(klass) \
> OBJECT_CLASS_CHECK(AArch64CPUClass, (klass), TYPE_AARCH64_CPU)
> diff --git a/target-arm/cpu.c b/target-arm/cpu.c
> index 3ca3fa8..7dc2595 100644
> --- a/target-arm/cpu.c
> +++ b/target-arm/cpu.c
> @@ -31,6 +31,12 @@
> #include "sysemu/kvm.h"
> #include "kvm_arm.h"
>
> +#ifdef DEBUG
> +# define DPRINTF(format, ...) printf("armcpu: " format , ## __VA_ARGS__)
> +#else
> +# define DPRINTF(format, ...) do { } while (0)
> +#endif
> +
> static void arm_cpu_set_pc(CPUState *cs, vaddr value)
> {
> ARMCPU *cpu = ARM_CPU(cs);
> @@ -367,12 +373,23 @@ static void arm_cpu_initfn(Object *obj)
> CPUState *cs = CPU(obj);
> ARMCPU *cpu = ARM_CPU(obj);
> static bool inited;
> + uint32_t Aff1, Aff0;
>
> cs->env_ptr = &cpu->env;
> cpu_exec_init(&cpu->env);
> cpu->cp_regs = g_hash_table_new_full(g_int_hash, g_int_equal,
> g_free, g_free);
>
> + /*
> + * We don't support setting cluster ID ([16..23]) (known as Aff2
> + * in later ARM ARM versions), or any of the higher affinity level
> fields,
> + * so these bits always RAZ.
> + */
> + Aff1 = cs->cpu_index / CPUS_PER_CLUSTER;
> + Aff0 = cs->cpu_index % CPUS_PER_CLUSTER;
> + cpu->mpidr = (Aff1 << 8) | Aff0;
> + DPRINTF("Init(%p): index %d mpidr 0x%jX\n", cpu, cs->cpu_index,
> cpu->mpidr);
> +
> #ifndef CONFIG_USER_ONLY
> /* Our inbound IRQ and FIQ lines */
> if (kvm_enabled()) {
> diff --git a/target-arm/helper.c b/target-arm/helper.c
> index 5d0f011..9535290 100644
> --- a/target-arm/helper.c
> +++ b/target-arm/helper.c
> @@ -2036,12 +2036,9 @@ static const ARMCPRegInfo strongarm_cp_reginfo[] = {
>
> static uint64_t mpidr_read(CPUARMState *env, const ARMCPRegInfo *ri)
> {
> - CPUState *cs = CPU(arm_env_get_cpu(env));
> - uint32_t mpidr = cs->cpu_index;
> - /* We don't support setting cluster ID ([8..11]) (known as Aff1
> - * in later ARM ARM versions), or any of the higher affinity level
> fields,
> - * so these bits always RAZ.
> - */
> + ARMCPU *cpu = ARM_CPU(arm_env_get_cpu(env));
> + uint64_t mpidr = cpu->mpidr;
> +
> if (arm_feature(env, ARM_FEATURE_V7MP)) {
> mpidr |= (1U << 31);
> /* Cores which are uniprocessor (non-coherent)
> diff --git a/target-arm/kvm64.c b/target-arm/kvm64.c
> index 93c1ca8..99fa34e 100644
> --- a/target-arm/kvm64.c
> +++ b/target-arm/kvm64.c
> @@ -25,6 +25,12 @@
> #include "internals.h"
> #include "hw/arm/arm.h"
>
> +#ifdef DEBUG
> +# define DPRINTF(format, ...) printf("arm-kvm64: " format , ## __VA_ARGS__)
> +#else
> +# define DPRINTF(format, ...) do { } while (0)
> +#endif
> +
> static inline void set_feature(uint64_t *features, int feature)
> {
> *features |= 1ULL << feature;
> @@ -77,6 +83,10 @@ bool kvm_arm_get_host_cpu_features(ARMHostCPUClass *ahcc)
> return true;
> }
>
> +#define ARM_MPIDR_HWID_BITMASK 0xFF00FFFFFFULL
> +#define ARM_CPU_ID 3, 0, 0, 0
> +#define ARM_CPU_ID_MPIDR 5
> +
> int kvm_arch_init_vcpu(CPUState *cs)
> {
> int ret;
> @@ -107,6 +117,21 @@ int kvm_arch_init_vcpu(CPUState *cs)
> return ret;
> }
>
> + /*
> + * When KVM is in use, psci is emulated in-kernel and not by qemu.
> + * In order for it to work correctly we should use correct MPIDR values,
> + * which appear to be inherited from the host.
why it must be inherited from host?
Could you point out to KVM code that depends on it?
> + * So we override our defaults by asking KVM about these values.
> + */
> + ret = kvm_get_one_reg(cs, ARM64_SYS_REG(ARM_CPU_ID, ARM_CPU_ID_MPIDR),
> + &cpu->mpidr);
> + if (ret) {
> + return ret;
> + }
> + cpu->mpidr &= ARM_MPIDR_HWID_BITMASK;
> + DPRINTF("Init(%p): index %d MPIDR 0x%jX\n", cpu,
> + cs->cpu_index, cpu->mpidr);
> +
> return kvm_arm_init_cpreg_list(cpu);
> }
>
> diff --git a/target-arm/psci.c b/target-arm/psci.c
> index d8fafab..2905be6 100644
> --- a/target-arm/psci.c
> +++ b/target-arm/psci.c
> @@ -72,6 +72,22 @@ bool arm_is_psci_call(ARMCPU *cpu, int excp_type)
> }
> }
>
> +static uint32_t mpidr_to_idx(uint64_t mpidr)
> +{
> + uint32_t Aff1, Aff0;
> +
> + /*
> + * MPIDR_EL1 [RES0:affinity-3:RES1:U:RES0:MT:affinity-1:affinity-0]
> + * GIC 500 code currently supports 32 clusters with 8 cores each
> + * but no more than 128 cores. Future version will have flexible
> + * affinity selection
> + * GIC 400 supports 8 cores so 0x7 for Aff0 is O.K. too
> + */
> + Aff1 = (mpidr & 0xff00) >> 8;
> + Aff0 = mpidr & 0xff;
> + return Aff1 * CPUS_PER_CLUSTER + Aff0;
> +}
> +
> void arm_handle_psci_call(ARMCPU *cpu)
> {
> /*
> @@ -121,7 +137,7 @@ void arm_handle_psci_call(ARMCPU *cpu)
>
> switch (param[2]) {
> case 0:
> - target_cpu_state = qemu_get_cpu(mpidr & 0xff);
> + target_cpu_state = qemu_get_cpu(mpidr_to_idx(mpidr));
> if (!target_cpu_state) {
> ret = QEMU_PSCI_RET_INVALID_PARAMS;
> break;
> @@ -153,7 +169,7 @@ void arm_handle_psci_call(ARMCPU *cpu)
> context_id = param[3];
>
> /* change to the cpu we are powering up */
> - target_cpu_state = qemu_get_cpu(mpidr & 0xff);
> + target_cpu_state = qemu_get_cpu(mpidr_to_idx(mpidr));
> if (!target_cpu_state) {
> ret = QEMU_PSCI_RET_INVALID_PARAMS;
> break;
- [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] Use Aff1 with mpidr, Pavel Fedin, 2015/05/22
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] Use Aff1 with mpidr, Shlomo Pongratz, 2015/05/28
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] Use Aff1 with mpidr,
Igor Mammedov <=
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] Use Aff1 with mpidr, Pavel Fedin, 2015/05/29
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] Use Aff1 with mpidr, Igor Mammedov, 2015/05/29
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] Use Aff1 with mpidr, Pavel Fedin, 2015/05/29
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] Use Aff1 with mpidr, Igor Mammedov, 2015/05/29
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] Use Aff1 with mpidr, Pavel Fedin, 2015/05/29
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] Use Aff1 with mpidr, Pavel Fedin, 2015/05/29
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] Use Aff1 with mpidr, Shannon Zhao, 2015/05/29